Literature DB >> 1979349

Clinical and laboratory effects of prolonged therapy with sulfasalazine, gold or penicillamine: the effects of disease duration on treatment response.

R D Situnayake1, B McConkey.   

Abstract

Serial observations for up to 5 years of clinical score (a subjective global assessment), serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were analyzed in 3 groups of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) requiring treatment with a second line drug. The groups comprised 315 patients (243 women, 72 men) who had sulfasalazine (SAS); 203 patients (141 women, 62 men) who had sodium aurothiomalate (gold) and 163 patients (131 women, 32 men) who had penicillamine. The groups matched in most respects but the gold group had a smaller proportion of women, a shorter median disease duration and a higher median CRP than the remaining 2 groups. The penicillamine group contained a higher proportion of seropositive patients. In each group there were significant improvements in clinical score, CRP and ESR for all time points from 6 to 30 months; these improvements were maintained for longer (up to 60 months for SAS) in the SAS and gold groups but the differences between the drugs after 30 months were probably a consequence of falling number of patients, not differing drug potencies. The mean ESR and CRP levels fell to about 30 mm/h and 20-30 mg/l, respectively. Response was defined as (1) treatment duration greater than 6 months, (2) clinical score improvement greater than 4 by 6 months, (3) ESR fall to less than 30 mm/h by 6 months. By these criteria 142 of 681 patients (20.9%) responded; the response rates were SAS 20.3%, gold 24.1%, penicillamine 17.8%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1979349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  6 in total

1.  Aggressive treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised controlled trial. On behalf of the Rheumatic Research Foundation Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Authors:  C H van Jaarsveld; J W Jacobs; M J van der Veen; A A Blaauw; A A Kruize; D M Hofman; H L Brus; G A van Albada-Kuipers; A H Heurkens; E J ter Borg; H C Haanen; C van Booma-Frankfort; Y Schenk; J W Bijlsma
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  A prospective analysis of risk factors for the discontinuation of second-line antirheumatic drugs.

Authors:  M J Wijnands; M A Van 't Hof; M A Van Leeuwen; M H Van Rijswijk; L B Van de Putte; P L Van Riel
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1993-10-15

3.  Functional improvement after patients with rheumatoid arthritis start a new disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) associated with frequent changes in DMARD: the CORRONA database.

Authors:  Veena K Ranganath; Harold E Paulus; Alina Onofrei; Dinesh Khanna; George Reed; David A Elashoff; Joel M Kremer; Daniel E Furst
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Improved functional outcome in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis treated with intramuscular gold: results of a five year prospective study.

Authors:  R Munro; R Hampson; A McEntegart; E A Thomson; R Madhok; H Capell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Expression of multidrug resistance-1 protein correlates with disease activity rather than the refractoriness to methotrexate therapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  V Agarwal; S K Mittal; R Misra
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 6.  Old drugs, old problems: where do we stand in prediction of rheumatoid arthritis responsiveness to methotrexate and other synthetic DMARDs?

Authors:  Vasco Crispim Romão; Helena Canhão; João Eurico Fonseca
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 8.775

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.