Literature DB >> 19791824

Do inhaled anticholinergics increase or decrease the risk of major cardiovascular events?: a synthesis of the available evidence.

Shelley R Salpeter1.   

Abstract

There has been recent uncertainty about whether the inhaled anticholinergic agents ipratropium bromide and tiotropium bromide increase or decrease cardiovascular risk in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This article synthesizes the available data in order to understand the controversy. COPD is a common cause of hospitalizations and is a rapidly increasing cause of mortality worldwide. Despite the heavy burden of COPD-related illness, the leading cause of hospitalization in COPD patients is cardiovascular disease. This link between COPD and cardiovascular disease is in part due to the fact that both diseases share common risk factors, such as tobacco smoking and advanced age. It is also hypothesized that systemic inflammation in COPD increases the risk for cardiac events such as myocardial infarction. Inhaled anticholinergics reduce COPD-related hospitalizations and respiratory deaths compared with placebo, and tiotropium bromide is more effective than ipratropium bromide. In randomized trials, patients receiving tiotropium bromide have lower discontinuation rates than those receiving placebo and, therefore, contribute more person-years to the analyses. In a recent large 4-year tiotropium bromide trial, the proportion of patients who died was similar in the tiotropium bromide and placebo groups, whereas the death rate per person-years was lower with tiotropium bromide, indicating longer overall survival. There has been conflicting evidence concerning cardiovascular risk associated with inhaled anticholinergics. One meta-analysis found that the risk for major cardiovascular events was higher with anticholinergics compared with placebo or active comparator controls, whereas two subsequent meta-analyses that included new trial data found no difference in risk. In a recent pooled safety analysis, when incidence rates of events over time were evaluated, tiotropium bromide was associated with a lower rate of major cardiovascular events and cardiovascular deaths compared with placebo. This risk reduction was mainly because of a reduction in serious cardiac events such as myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure. In conclusion, inhaled anticholinergics, especially tiotropium bromide, reduce COPD-related hospitalizations and deaths, and may improve total survival over time. Many COPD patients have concomitant cardiovascular disease processes. Thus, trials may observe more cardiovascular events associated with anticholinergics than with placebo, but this differential is eliminated when evaluating the rate of events per person-years of exposure. New evidence indicates that tiotropium bromide may actually reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events and deaths over time. It is possible that the reduction in respiratory morbidity could improve functional status and reduce adverse cardiac outcomes over time. Further studies are needed to address this important issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19791824     DOI: 10.2165/11318580-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  47 in total

1.  Cardiovascular effects of beta-agonists in patients with asthma and COPD: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shelley R Salpeter; Thomas M Ormiston; Edwin E Salpeter
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  The spirometric efficacy of once-daily dosing with tiotropium in stable COPD: a 13-week multicenter trial. The US Tiotropium Study Group.

Authors:  R Casaburi; D D Briggs; J F Donohue; C W Serby; S S Menjoge; T J Witek
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Tiotropium for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  R G Barr; J Bourbeau; C A Camargo; F S F Ram
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 4.  The role of anticholinergics in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Peter J Barnes
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-12-20       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  A randomized study of tiotropium Respimat Soft Mist inhaler vs. ipratropium pMDI in COPD.

Authors:  T Voshaar; R Lapidus; R Maleki-Yazdi; W Timmer; E Rubin; L Lowe; E Bateman
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 3.415

Review 6.  Cardiovascular safety of beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist use in patients with obstructive airway disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shelley R Salpeter
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Health outcomes following treatment for six months with once daily tiotropium compared with twice daily salmeterol in patients with COPD.

Authors:  V Brusasco; R Hodder; M Miravitlles; L Korducki; L Towse; S Kesten
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 8.  Heart and lungs in COPD. Close friends in real life--separate in daily medical practice?

Authors:  M Lusuardi; G Garuti; M Massobrio; L Spagnolatti; S Bendinelli
Journal:  Monaldi Arch Chest Dis       Date:  2008-03

9.  Effect of tiotropium on sputum and serum inflammatory markers and exacerbations in COPD.

Authors:  D J Powrie; T M A Wilkinson; G C Donaldson; P Jones; K Scrine; K Viel; S Kesten; J A Wedzicha
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 16.671

10.  Cardiovascular morbidity and the use of inhaled bronchodilators.

Authors:  Christine Macie; Kate Wooldrage; Jure Manfreda; Nicholas Anthonisen
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2008
View more
  7 in total

1.  Setting the record straight on TIDE: a lost opportunity for patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Zubin Punthakee; Jackie Bosch; Hertzel C Gerstein
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Comparison between ATS/ERS age- and gender-adjusted criteria and GOLD criteria for the detection of irreversible airway obstruction in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Richard Steinacher; John T Parissis; Bernhard Strohmer; Jörg Eichinger; Dennis Rottlaender; Uta C Hoppe; Johann Altenberger
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single and repeat inhaled doses of umeclidinium in healthy subjects: two randomized studies.

Authors:  Anthony Cahn; Ruth Tal-Singer; Isabelle J Pouliquen; Rashmi Mehta; Andrew Preece; Kelly Hardes; Glenn Crater; Amanda Deans
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Tiotropium HandiHaler(®) and Respimat(®) in COPD: a pooled safety analysis.

Authors:  David Mg Halpin; Ronald Dahl; Christoph Hallmann; Achim Mueller; Donald Tashkin
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2015-02-05

5.  Cardiac safety of tiotropium in patients with cardiac events: a retrospective analysis of the UPLIFT® trial.

Authors:  Donald P Tashkin; Inge Leimer; Norbert Metzdorf; Marc Decramer
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2015-06-02

6.  Inhaled anticholinergic use and all-cause mortality among elderly Medicare beneficiaries with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Mayank Ajmera; Chan Shen; Xiaoyun Pan; Patricia A Findley; George Rust; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2013-06-10

7.  Safety and tolerability of once-daily umeclidinium/vilanterol 125/25 mcg and umeclidinium 125 mcg in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  James F Donohue; Dennis Niewoehner; Jean Brooks; Dianne O'Dell; Alison Church
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2014-07-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.