Literature DB >> 19791629

Waist circumference, pedometer placement, and step-counting accuracy in youth.

Mark G Abel1, James C Hannon, Patricia A Eisenman, Lynda B Ransdell, Marjorie Pett, Daniel P Williams.   

Abstract

This study examined whether differences in waist circumference (WC) and pedometer placement (anterior vs. midaxillary vs. posterior) affect the agreement between pedometer and observed steps during treadmill and self-paced walking. Participants included 19 pairs of youth (9- 15-years-old) who were matched for sex, race, and height and stratified by WC (high WC: HWC; low WC: LWC). Participants performed 3-min treadmill-walking trials at speeds of 59, 72, and 86 m x min(-1) and a 400-m self-paced walking trial on level ground. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between pedometer and observed steps of spring-levered pedometers by WC, pedometer placement, and walking speed. In the HWC group, the posterior pedometer placement consistently agreed most closely with observed steps at all treadmill speeds and during self-paced walking. In the LWC group, no single pedometer placement consistently agreed most closely with observed steps at all treadmill speeds and during self-paced walking. We conclude that a posterior pedometer placement improves step-count accuracy in most youth with an HWC at a range of walking speeds on level ground.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19791629     DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2009.10599581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport        ISSN: 0270-1367            Impact factor:   2.500


  5 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of physical activity and energy expenditure: an overview of objective measures.

Authors:  Andrew P Hills; Najat Mokhtar; Nuala M Byrne
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2014-06-16

Review 2.  A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study.

Authors:  Kieran P Dowd; Robert Szeklicki; Marco Alessandro Minetto; Marie H Murphy; Angela Polito; Ezio Ghigo; Hidde van der Ploeg; Ulf Ekelund; Janusz Maciaszek; Rafal Stemplewski; Maciej Tomczak; Alan E Donnelly
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 6.457

3.  Sources and magnitude of variability in pedometer-determined physical activity levels of youth.

Authors:  So-Yeun Kim; Hye-Sang Park
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2015-12-31

4.  Validity of SC-StepRx pedometer-derived moderate and vigorous physical activity during treadmill walking and running in a heterogeneous sample of children and youth.

Authors:  Travis John Saunders; Casey Ellen Gray; Michael Marc Borghese; Allison McFarlane; Afekwo Mbonu; Zachary Michael Ferraro; Mark Stephen Tremblay
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Influence of Pedometer Position on Pedometer Accuracy at Various Walking Speeds: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Frederic Ehrler; Chloé Weber; Christian Lovis
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 5.428

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.