Literature DB >> 19789963

Conditional modeling of antibody titers using a zero-inflated poisson random effects model: application to Fabrazyme.

Peter L Bonate1, Crystal Sung, Karen Welch, Susan Richards.   

Abstract

Patients that are exposed to biotechnology-derived therapeutics often develop antibodies to the therapeutic, the magnitude of which is assessed by measuring antibody titers. A statistical approach for analyzing antibody titer data conditional on seroconversion is presented. The proposed method is to first transform the antibody titer data based on a geometric series using a common ratio of 2 and a scale factor of 50 and then analyze the exponent using a zero-inflated or hurdle model assuming a Poisson or negative binomial distribution with random effects to account for patient heterogeneity. Patient specific covariates can be used to model the probability of developing an antibody response, i.e., seroconversion, as well as the magnitude of the antibody titer itself. The method was illustrated using antibody titer data from 87 male seroconverted Fabry patients receiving Fabrazyme. Titers from five clinical trials were collected over 276 weeks of therapy with anti-Fabrazyme IgG titers ranging from 100 to 409,600 after exclusion of seronegative patients. The best model to explain seroconversion was a zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) model where cumulative dose (under a constant dose regimen of dosing every 2 weeks) influenced the probability of seroconversion. There was an 80% chance of seroconversion when the cumulative dose reached 210 mg (90% confidence interval: 194-226 mg). No difference in antibody titers was noted between Japanese or Western patients. Once seroconverted, antibody titers did not remain constant but decreased in an exponential manner from an initial magnitude to a new lower steady-state value. The expected titer after the new steady-state titer had been achieved was 870 (90% CI: 630-1109). The half-life to the new steady-state value after seroconversion was 44 weeks (90% CI: 17-70 weeks). Time to seroconversion did not appear to be correlated with titer at the time of seroconversion. The method can be adequately used to model antibody titer data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19789963     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-009-9132-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  5 in total

Review 1.  Bioequivalence and the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Huub Schellekens
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  On the use of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling vaccine adverse event count data.

Authors:  C E Rose; S W Martin; K A Wannemuehler; B D Plikaytis
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  A SAS macro for parametric and semiparametric mixture cure models.

Authors:  Fabien Corbière; Pierre Joly
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Poisson regression analysis in clinical research.

Authors:  F Kianifard; P P Gallo
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.051

5.  Long-term safety and efficacy of enzyme replacement therapy for Fabry disease.

Authors:  William R Wilcox; Maryam Banikazemi; Nathalie Guffon; Stephen Waldek; Philip Lee; Gabor E Linthorst; Robert J Desnick; Dominique P Germain
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 11.025

  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  A mathematical model of the effect of immunogenicity on therapeutic protein pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Xiaoying Chen; Timothy Hickling; Eugenia Kraynov; Bing Kuang; Chuenlei Parng; Paolo Vicini
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  The Mystery of Antibodies Against Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) - What do we Know?

Authors:  Christian Lubich; Peter Allacher; Maurus de la Rosa; Alexander Bauer; Thomas Prenninger; Frank Michael Horling; Jürgen Siekmann; Johannes Oldenburg; Friedrich Scheiflinger; Birgit Maria Reipert
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Review on modeling anti-antibody responses to monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  José David Gómez-Mantilla; Iñaki F Trocóniz; Zinnia Parra-Guillén; María J Garrido
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 4.  A white paper--consensus and recommendations of a global harmonization team on assessing the impact of immunogenicity on pharmacokinetic measurements.

Authors:  J M Sailstad; L Amaravadi; A Clements-Egan; B Gorovits; H A Myler; R C Pillutla; S Pursuhothama; M Putman; M K Rose; K Sonehara; L Tang; J T Wustner
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 5.  The utility of modeling and simulation approaches to evaluate immunogenicity effect on the therapeutic protein pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Juan Jose Perez Ruixo; Peiming Ma; Andrew T Chow
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Population pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of oral everolimus in patients with seizures associated with tuberous sclerosis complex.

Authors:  François Pierre Combes; Guillaume Baneyx; Neva Coello; Penny Zhu; William Sallas; Hequn Yin; Jerry Nedelman
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 2.745

7.  Modeling and simulation of count data.

Authors:  E L Plan
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2014-08-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.