PURPOSE: To improve the efficacy and reduce the gastrointestinal toxicity of the cancer prodrug, CPT-11, we have developed immunoconjugates of its active form, SN-38, and an anti-CEACAM5 antibody for targeted chemotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: SN-38 conjugates of the anti-CEACAM5 monoclonal antibody, labetuzumab (hMN-14), varying in the nature of the cross-linker attachment at the drug's 20-hydroxyl position, were evaluated in vitro, in metastatic and/or s.c. human colonic and pancreatic cancer xenografts in nude mice using appropriate controls, and in a CEACAM5-negative tumor model. RESULTS: A pilot study in a s.c. LS174T model of human colonic carcinoma established the relative effectiveness of different conjugates. In the lung metastatic model of GW-39 human colonic carcinoma in nude mice, therapy with two specific labetuzumab-SN-38 conjugates, using 0.25 mg SN-38 equivalent/kg, q4d x 8, significantly extended median survival time versus controls (P < 0.002). In an expanded evaluation in the s.c. LS174T xenograft model, specific SN-38 conjugates produced significant tumor growth control and increases in median survival time versus other controls, including CPT-11 at a 33-fold greater cumulative dose (P < 0.01). An improvement was also observed in the therapy of a s.c. human pancreatic tumor xenograft. In a CEACAM5-negative systemic lymphoma xenograft, one labetuzumab-SN-38 conjugate examined was ineffective, whereas the conjugate specific for the tumor model produced 100% survival. CONCLUSIONS: The promising labetuzumab-SN-38 conjugates developed showed selective therapeutic efficacy in human tumor models at nontoxic doses that were a fraction of the CPT-11 doses used.
PURPOSE: To improve the efficacy and reduce the gastrointestinal toxicity of the cancer prodrug, CPT-11, we have developed immunoconjugates of its active form, SN-38, and an anti-CEACAM5 antibody for targeted chemotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:SN-38 conjugates of the anti-CEACAM5 monoclonal antibody, labetuzumab (hMN-14), varying in the nature of the cross-linker attachment at the drug's 20-hydroxyl position, were evaluated in vitro, in metastatic and/or s.c. humancolonic and pancreatic cancer xenografts in nude mice using appropriate controls, and in a CEACAM5-negative tumor model. RESULTS: A pilot study in a s.c. LS174T model of humancolonic carcinoma established the relative effectiveness of different conjugates. In the lung metastatic model of GW-39 humancolonic carcinoma in nude mice, therapy with two specific labetuzumab-SN-38 conjugates, using 0.25 mg SN-38 equivalent/kg, q4d x 8, significantly extended median survival time versus controls (P < 0.002). In an expanded evaluation in the s.c. LS174T xenograft model, specific SN-38 conjugates produced significant tumor growth control and increases in median survival time versus other controls, including CPT-11 at a 33-fold greater cumulative dose (P < 0.01). An improvement was also observed in the therapy of a s.c. humanpancreatic tumor xenograft. In a CEACAM5-negative systemic lymphoma xenograft, one labetuzumab-SN-38 conjugate examined was ineffective, whereas the conjugate specific for the tumor model produced 100% survival. CONCLUSIONS: The promising labetuzumab-SN-38 conjugates developed showed selective therapeutic efficacy in humantumor models at nontoxic doses that were a fraction of the CPT-11 doses used.
Authors: N Beauchemin; P Draber; G Dveksler; P Gold; S Gray-Owen; F Grunert; S Hammarström; K V Holmes; A Karlsson; M Kuroki; S H Lin; L Lucka; S M Najjar; M Neumaier; B Obrink; J E Shively; K M Skubitz; C P Stanners; P Thomas; J A Thompson; M Virji; S von Kleist; C Wagener; S Watt; W Zimmermann Journal: Exp Cell Res Date: 1999-11-01 Impact factor: 3.905
Authors: J W Singer; P De Vries; R Bhatt; J Tulinsky; P Klein; C Li; L Milas; R A Lewis; S Wallace Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2000 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: S Okuno; M Harada; T Yano; S Yano; S Kiuchi; N Tsuda; Y Sakamura; J Imai; T Kawaguchi; K Tsujihara Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2000-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Thomas M Behr; Torsten Liersch; Lutz Greiner-Bechert; Frank Griesinger; Martin Béhé; Peter M Markus; Stefan Gratz; Christa Angerstein; Gerhard Brittinger; Heinz Becker; David M Goldenberg; Wolfgang Becker Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Moreno Zamai; Martin VandeVen; Mariella Farao; Enrico Gratton; Alberto Ghiglieri; Maria G Castelli; Erminia Fontana; Roland D'Argy; Antonio Fiorino; Enrico Pesenti; Antonino Suarato; Valeria R Caiolfa Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: J Allen Zhang; Tong Xuan; Manjeet Parmar; Lan Ma; Sydney Ugwu; Shahid Ali; Imran Ahmad Journal: Int J Pharm Date: 2004-02-11 Impact factor: 5.875
Authors: Anthony W Tolcher; Leonel Ochoa; Lisa A Hammond; Amita Patnaik; Tam Edwards; Chris Takimoto; Lon Smith; Johann de Bono; Garry Schwartz; Theresa Mays; Zdenka L Jonak; Randall Johnson; Mark DeWitte; Helen Martino; Charlene Audette; Kate Maes; Ravi V J Chari; John M Lambert; Eric K Rowinsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-01-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gary L Griffiths; M Jules Mattes; Rhona Stein; Serengulam V Govindan; Ivan D Horak; Hans J Hansen; David M Goldenberg Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Alexander N Starodub; Allyson J Ocean; Manish A Shah; Michael J Guarino; Vincent J Picozzi; Linda T Vahdat; Sajeve S Thomas; Serengulam V Govindan; Pius P Maliakal; William A Wegener; Steven A Hamburger; Robert M Sharkey; David M Goldenberg Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-05-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Massimo Fantini; Justin M David; Christina M Annunziata; Maria Pia Morelli; Phillip M Arlen; Kwong Y Tsang Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: Christian L Barrett; Richard B Schwab; HyunChul Jung; Brian Crain; Daniel J Goff; Catriona H M Jamieson; Patricia A Thistlethwaite; Olivier Harismendy; Dennis A Carson; Kelly A Frazer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-20 Impact factor: 3.240