Literature DB >> 19788816

Genetic differences between avian and human isolates of Candida dubliniensis.

Brenda A McManus1, Derek J Sullivan, Gary P Moran, Christophe d'Enfert, Marie Elisabeth Bougnoux, Miles A Nunn, David C Coleman.   

Abstract

When Candida dubliniensis isolates obtained from seabird excrement and from humans in Ireland were compared by using multilocus sequence typing, 13 of 14 avian isolates were genetically distinct from human isolates. The remaining avian isolate was indistinguishable from a human isolate, suggesting that transmission may occur between humans and birds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19788816      PMCID: PMC2819872          DOI: 10.3201/eid1509.081660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Candida dubliniensis is an opportunistic yeast species phenotypically and genetically closely related to C. albicans, the most common cause of Candida infection. However, C. dubliniensis is less pathogenic and is most commonly associated with superficial infection in immunocompromised persons. Although C. albicans has frequently been isolated from avian and animal sources (–), the recent study by Nunn et al. identified C. dubliniensis from a nonhuman source (). These isolates were obtained from the surface of Ixodes uriae ticks that lived in cracks filled with seabird excrement at 2 locations at a seabird breeding colony on Great Saltee Island off the southeastern coast of Ireland. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is an informative tool for investigating the population structure and epidemiology of many bacterial and fungal species (). We have used MLST to show that C. dubliniensis has less genetic diversity than C. albicans and that C. dubliniensis isolates comprise 3 distinct clades (C1, C2, and C3), which correspond to described internally transcribed spacer (ITS) region genotypes 1–4 (). Two other research groups recently used MLST to show genetic differences between C. albicans isolates from humans and animals (,). The purpose of our study was to use MLST, the presence or absence of a previously identified polymorphism in the CDR1 gene (), and mating type analysis to determine genetic relatedness between avian-associated and human C. dubliniensis isolates and whether avian-associated isolates are a source of human opportunistic infections.

The Study

To obtain avian-associated C. dubliniensis isolates from a novel geographic site, fresh seabird excrement was sampled from the campus of Trinity College Dublin, ≈150 km north of Great Saltee Island by using nitrogen-gassed VI-PAK sterile swabs (Sarstedt-Drinagh, Wexford, Ireland). Samples were plated within 2 h of collection on CHROMagar Candida medium (CHROMagar, Paris, France), incubated at 30°C for 48 h, and identified as described (,–). Three new C. dubliniensis isolates were obtained from 134 fecal samples. Like isolates from Great Saltee Island (), these 3 isolates obtained directly from freshly deposited herring gull (Larus argentatus) excrement were ITS genotype 1 (). Because the isolates originally described by Nunn et al. () were obtained from the surface of ticks living in avian excrement, avian-associated isolates refers to avian excrement–associated isolates. The avian-associated isolates were compared with 31 human C. dubliniensis strains belonging to MLST clade C1 as previously reported (), and 5 additional C. dubliniensis clade C1 human isolates from Ireland (Table).
Table

Newly investigated avian-associated and human isolates of Candida dubliniensis, Ireland*

IsolateSourceYear of isolationLocationDST†Mating typeTAGReference
SL411Ixodes uriae ticks2007GSI27aa+ (5)
SL422 I. uriae 2007GSI27aa+ (5)
SL370 I. uriae 2007GSI27aa+ (5)
SL410 I. uriae 2007GSI29aa+ (5)
SL375-I I. uriae 2007GSI31aa+ (5)
SL375-II I. uriae 2007GSI31aa+ (5)
SL397 I. uriae 2007GSI31aa+ (5)
SL414 I. uriae 2007GSI31aa+ (5)
SL495 I. uriae 2007GSI33aa+ (5)
SL509 I. uriae 2007GSI30aa+ (5)
SL522 I. uriae 2007GSI31aa+ (5)
AV5 Larus argentatus‡ 2008TCD29aa+This study
AV6 L. argentatus 2008TCD27aa+This study
AV7 L. argentatus 2008TCD2+This study
CD06032Human, oral2006Ireland36ααThis study
CD06027Human, oral2006Ireland1+This study
CD0512Human, oral2005Ireland37This study
CD524Human, oral1997Ireland35 (13)
CD505Human, oral1989Ireland28αα+ (13)

*All 19 isolates were internal transcribed spacer genotype 1 and belonged to multilocus sequence typing clade C1. DST, diploid sequence type; TAG, TAG polymorphism; GSI, Great Saltee Island off the southeastern coast of Ireland; TCD, Trinity College Dublin.
†Assigned to each isolate according the recommended multilocus sequence typing scheme for C. dubliniensis (scheme D) (). All DSTs, except for DST1 and DST 2, are new.
‡Herring gull.

*All 19 isolates were internal transcribed spacer genotype 1 and belonged to multilocus sequence typing clade C1. DST, diploid sequence type; TAG, TAG polymorphism; GSI, Great Saltee Island off the southeastern coast of Ireland; TCD, Trinity College Dublin.
†Assigned to each isolate according the recommended multilocus sequence typing scheme for C. dubliniensis (scheme D) (). All DSTs, except for DST1 and DST 2, are new.
‡Herring gull. Isolates were assigned a diploid sequence type (DST) on the basis of genotype numbers for the 8 loci in the recommended C. dubliniensis MLST typing scheme () (Table). Six new DSTs were identified in 13 of 14 avian-associated isolates because of the identification of 2 new exZWF1b alleles that were found exclusively in avian- associated isolates. DST2 was the only previously identified DST (isolate AV7, Table). DST 31 was the most frequently (5/14 isolates) found DST in avian-associated C. dubliniensis isolates, all 5 of which were from Great Saltee Island (). Four isolates belonged to DST 27, three from Great Saltee Island and 1 from Dublin (Table). Polymorphic sites (n = 36) from the 8 MLST loci () of all 50 clade C1 human and avian-associated C. dubliniensis isolates were concatenated and used to construct a neighbor-joining tree (MEGA software program version 3.1 []), which included all known clade C1 DSTs identified. Thirteen of 14 avian-associated C. dubliniensis isolates, 11 from Great Saltee Island () and 2 from Dublin, formed a distinct subgroup within clade C1 (Figure, panel A). This same subgroup was also identified in trees generated by using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean, maximum parsimony, and maximum likelihood, and based on related sequence types (BURST) analysis. To test for genetic separation between human and avian-associated isolates obtained from the same country, a neighbor-joining tree was constructed by using 13 avian-associated and human clade C1 isolates from Ireland, each of which represented unique DSTs. The tree showed the robustness of the avian-associated subgroup within a population of human isolates from the same country, and the distribution of avian-associated and human isolates differed significantly (p = 0.025, by Fisher exact test) (www.exactoid.com/fisher/index.php) (Figure, panel B).
Figure

Neighbor-joining trees based on the polymorphic sites in Candida dubliniensis multilocus sequence typing (MLST) sequences. Bootstrap values >60% are indicated at cluster nodes. Avian-associated isolates are indicated in red. Numbers of polymorphic sites in isolates are indicated by scale bars. A) Isolates of MLST clade C1 defined by McManus et al. () showing location of avian-associated isolates in relation to human isolates in the same clade; human isolates were originally obtained in many countries. B) Neighbor-joining tree based on polymorphic sites in MLST sequences for each of 13 internal transcribed spacer genotype 1 C. dubliniensis isolates, 7 of which were obtained from humans in Ireland and 6 from seabird excrement in Ireland. Isolates that had identical diploid sequence types (DSTs) were not included in the tree so that only 1 of each DST is included. Tree displays the robustness of the avian-associated subgroup of isolates within a population of similar human-associated isolates from the same region. The rate of heterozygosity among human and avian-associated clade C1 isolates was 1.6 and 1 heterozygous site per DST, respectively, from 36 polymorphic sites, which indicated that avian-associated isolates were more clonal.

Neighbor-joining trees based on the polymorphic sites in Candida dubliniensis multilocus sequence typing (MLST) sequences. Bootstrap values >60% are indicated at cluster nodes. Avian-associated isolates are indicated in red. Numbers of polymorphic sites in isolates are indicated by scale bars. A) Isolates of MLST clade C1 defined by McManus et al. () showing location of avian-associated isolates in relation to human isolates in the same clade; human isolates were originally obtained in many countries. B) Neighbor-joining tree based on polymorphic sites in MLST sequences for each of 13 internal transcribed spacer genotype 1 C. dubliniensis isolates, 7 of which were obtained from humans in Ireland and 6 from seabird excrement in Ireland. Isolates that had identical diploid sequence types (DSTs) were not included in the tree so that only 1 of each DST is included. Tree displays the robustness of the avian-associated subgroup of isolates within a population of similar human-associated isolates from the same region. The rate of heterozygosity among human and avian-associated clade C1 isolates was 1.6 and 1 heterozygous site per DST, respectively, from 36 polymorphic sites, which indicated that avian-associated isolates were more clonal. The prevalence of a common point mutation, previously identified in the CDR1 gene of some ITS genotype 1 isolates, was determined for avian and human C. dubliniensis isolates as described previously (). All 14 avian-associated isolates had the TAG polymorphism (Table) compared with 19 (53%) of 36 human clade C1 isolates. The mating types of the isolates were determined by multiplex PCR amplification by using 2 pairs of mating type locus (MTL)–specific primers. A 535-bp amplimer was generated with primers MTLa1-F (5′-TGAAAATGAAGACAATGCGA-3′) and MTLa1-R (5′-CATCTTTTTCTGCTATCAATTC-3′) in the presence of MTL type a DNA, and a 615-bp product resulted from primers MTLα1-F (5′-ATGAATTCACATCTGGAGGC-3′) and MTLα1-R (5′-CTGTTAATAGCAAAGCAGCC-3′) in the presence of MTL type α DNA. Amplification reactions contained 10 pmol of each of the forward and reverse primers, 2.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 9.0 at 25°C, 10 mmol/L KCl, 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100, 1.25 U GoTaq polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and 25 μL of template DNA in a total volume of 50 μL. Cycling conditions were at 94°C for 10 min; 30 cycles at 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 2 min, and 72°C for 3 min; and a final step at 72°C for 10 min. Of the 14 avian excrement–associated isolates, 13 were MTLa homozygous (a/a), (Table). Only 4 (11.1%) of 36 human clade C1 isolates were homozygous for MTLa; 28 (77.7%) of 36 were heterozygous for MTL (a/α). A previous study also reported that 17 (20.7%) of 82 human C. dubliniensis isolates were homozygous for MTLa (). The gull isolate AV7 was indistinguishable from human isolates CD71, SA115, and CM1 by MLST and has the same mating type (a/α). We propose that AV7 may be a human isolate that colonized a gull scavenging on the Trinity College Dublin campus. The TAG polymorphism and mating type data from the avian-associated isolates suggest a highly clonal population.

Conclusions

The avian-associated C. dubliniensis isolates investigated belong to MLST clade C1, which includes most human isolates. However, most (13/14) of the avian-associated isolates form a distinct subgroup within this clade, which suggests that despite the low level of variation within C. dubliniensis, a distinct avian subpopulation may be present. This suggestion is supported by the observation that 2/3 isolates (AV5 and AV6) obtained in Dublin belonged to the same subpopulation (defined by MLST, CDR1, and MTL loci) as isolates obtained from Great Saltee Island, which is 150 km from Dublin. Similar data suggesting genetic separation and differential clade distribution between human and animal populations of C. albicans have been reported (,). The presence of the avian-associated subgroup within the most predominant clade (C1), which had previously only been identified in human isolates, and the close genetic relatedness between isolates, in particular gull isolate AV7, suggests that transmission between the 2 hosts can occur. However, in this instance the most likely direction of transfer is from human to bird.
  15 in total

1.  MEGA3: Integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Koichiro Tamura; Masatoshi Nei
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  Genetic relationship between human and animal isolates of Candida albicans.

Authors:  Anke Edelmann; Monika Krüger; Jan Schmid
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Isolation of Candida albicans and halophilic Vibrio spp. from aquatic birds in Connecticut and Florida.

Authors:  J D Buck
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Identification of four distinct genotypes of Candida dubliniensis and detection of microevolution in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Sarah F Gee; Sophie Joly; David R Soll; Jacques F G M Meis; Paul E Verweij; Itzhack Polacheck; Derek J Sullivan; David C Coleman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Molecular and phenotypic analysis of Candida dubliniensis: a recently identified species linked with oral candidosis in HIV-infected and AIDS patients.

Authors:  D Coleman; D Sullivan; B Harrington; K Haynes; M Henman; D Shanley; D Bennett; G Moran; C McCreary; L O'Neill
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.511

6.  Rapid identification of Candida dubliniensis with commercial yeast identification systems.

Authors:  D H Pincus; D C Coleman; W R Pruitt; A A Padhye; I F Salkin; M Geimer; A Bassel; D J Sullivan; M Clarke; V Hearn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Phylogenetic analysis and rapid identification of Candida dubliniensis based on analysis of ACT1 intron and exon sequences.

Authors:  Samantha M Donnelly; Derek J Sullivan; Diarmuid B Shanley; David C Coleman
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.777

8.  Molecular phylogenetic analysis of a geographically and temporally matched set of Candida albicans isolates from humans and nonmigratory wildlife in central Illinois.

Authors:  Lauren Wrobel; Julia K Whittington; Claude Pujol; Soon-Hwan Oh; Marilyn O Ruiz; Michael A Pfaller; Daniel J Diekema; David R Soll; Lois L Hoyer
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2008-07-11

9.  The closely related species Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis can mate.

Authors:  Claude Pujol; Karla J Daniels; Shawn R Lockhart; Thyagarajan Srikantha; Joshua B Radke; Jeremy Geiger; David R Soll
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2004-08

10.  Differentiation of Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans on Pal's agar.

Authors:  Asmaa Al Mosaid; Derek J Sullivan; David C Coleman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Investigating Clinical Issues by Genotyping of Medically Important Fungi: Why and How?

Authors:  Alexandre Alanio; Marie Desnos-Ollivier; Dea Garcia-Hermoso; Stéphane Bretagne
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Enrichment of multilocus sequence typing clade 1 with oral Candida albicans isolates in patients with untreated periodontitis.

Authors:  Brenda A McManus; Rory Maguire; Phillipa J Cashin; Noel Claffey; Stephen Flint; Mohammed H Abdulrahim; David C Coleman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  First-time isolation of Candida dubliniensis from plaque and carious dentine of primary teeth.

Authors:  S Kneist; A Borutta; B W Sigusch; S Nietzsche; H Küpper; M Kostrzewa; A Callaway
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2015-03-24

4.  Investigation of culturable human gut mycobiota from the segamat community in Johor, Malaysia.

Authors:  Marie Andrea Laetitia Huët; Li Wen Wong; Calvin Bok Sun Goh; Md Hamed Hussain; Nazmul Hasan Muzahid; Jacky Dwiyanto; Shaun Wen Huey Lee; Qasim Ayub; Daniel Reidpath; Sui Mae Lee; Sadequr Rahman; Joash Ban Lee Tan
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Methods of Candida dubliniensis identification and its occurrence in human clinical material.

Authors:  Martina Mahelová; Filip Růžička
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.099

6.  A Ser29Leu substitution in the cytosine deaminase Fca1p is responsible for clade-specific flucytosine resistance in Candida dubliniensis.

Authors:  Brenda A McManus; Gary P Moran; Judy A Higgins; Derek J Sullivan; David C Coleman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Calcineurin controls drug tolerance, hyphal growth, and virulence in Candida dubliniensis.

Authors:  Ying-Lien Chen; Alexandra Brand; Emma L Morrison; Fitz Gerald S Silao; Ursela G Bigol; Fedelino F Malbas; Jeniel E Nett; David R Andes; Norma V Solis; Scott G Filler; Anna Averette; Joseph Heitman
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2011-04-29

8.  Candida dubliniensis: an appraisal of its clinical significance as a bloodstream pathogen.

Authors:  Ziauddin Khan; Suhail Ahmad; Leena Joseph; Rachel Chandy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Candida species Rewired Hyphae Developmental Programs for Chlamydospore Formation.

Authors:  Bettina Böttcher; Christine Pöllath; Peter Staib; Bernhard Hube; Sascha Brunke
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida glabrata circulates between humans and yellow-legged gulls.

Authors:  Mohammed Hashim Al-Yasiri; Anne-Cécile Normand; Coralie L'Ollivier; Laurence Lachaud; Nathalie Bourgeois; Stanislas Rebaudet; Renaud Piarroux; Jean-François Mauffrey; Stéphane Ranque
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.