Literature DB >> 19788530

When are attention and saccade preparation dissociated?

Artem V Belopolsky1, Jan Theeuwes.   

Abstract

To understand the mechanisms of visual attention, it is crucial to know the relationship between attention and saccades. Some theories propose a close relationship, whereas others view the attention and saccade systems as completely independent. One possible way to resolve this controversy is to distinguish between the maintenance and shifting of attention. The present study used a novel paradigm that allowed simultaneous measurement of attentional allocation and saccade preparation. Saccades toward the location where attention was maintained were either facilitated or suppressed depending on the probability of making a saccade to that location and the match between the attended location and the saccade location on the previous trial. Shifting attention to another location was always associated with saccade facilitation. The findings provide a new view, demonstrating that the maintenance of attention and shifting of attention differ in their relationship to the oculomotor system.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19788530     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02445.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  33 in total

1.  Pure perceptual-based learning of second-, third-, and fourth-order sequential probabilities.

Authors:  Gilbert Remillard
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-09-15

2.  Evidence from the eyes: Threatening postures hold attention.

Authors:  Bobby Azarian; Elizabeth G Esser; Matthew S Peterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

3.  Time course of motor preparation during visual search with flexible stimulus-response association.

Authors:  Husam A Katnani; Neeraj J Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Negative priming for target selection with saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Tim Donovan; Trevor J Crawford; Damien Litchfield
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Postural control in strabismic children versus non strabismic age-matched children.

Authors:  Cynthia Lions; Emmanuel Bui-Quoc; Maria Pia Bucci
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Adaptive deployment of spatial and feature-based attention before saccades.

Authors:  Alex L White; Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Oculomotor interference during manual response preparation: evidence from the response-cueing paradigm.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Jos J Adam
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Rapid simultaneous enhancement of visual sensitivity and perceived contrast during saccade preparation.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Orienting of attention: Then and now.

Authors:  Michael I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  The time course of exogenous and endogenous control of covert attention.

Authors:  Clayton Hickey; Wieske van Zoest; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.