Literature DB >> 19788486

Prophylactic gastrostomy tubes for patients receiving radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancers: a retrospective review.

J H Chang1, T Gosling, J Larsen, S Powell, R Scanlon, S Chander.   

Abstract

Patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancers often experience significant complications. We sought to evaluate the impact of prophylactic gastrostomy tubes (PGTs) among these patients on four easily evaluable adverse outcomes, namely, absolute weight loss, percentage weight loss, admissions for nutritional reasons and treatment interruptions. A retrospective review was carried out on patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for primary head and neck cancers from September 1999 to October 2005 at the Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre (n = 71). PGTs were placed in 7 (10%) patients. Patients with PGTs were compared with the patients without PGTs (the control group) by univariate and multivariate analyses. By univariate analysis, there was no significant difference in absolute or percentage weight loss between those with PGTs and the control group. By multivariate analysis, those with PGTs lost 5.2% (P = 0.016) less weight than the control group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to admissions for nutritional reasons or treatment interruptions. The use of PGTs can reduce weight loss in patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancers, and its use should be further evaluated in future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19788486     DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02103.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1754-9477            Impact factor:   1.735


  7 in total

1.  Validation of an updated evidence-based protocol for proactive gastrostomy tube insertion in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  T E Brown; V Getliffe; M D Banks; B G M Hughes; C Y Lin; L M Kenny; J D Bauer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Nutrition support and therapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Arvin C Gee; Laszlo Kiraly; Mary S McCarthy; Robert Martindale
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-08

3.  Does PEG use cause dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients?

Authors:  Susan Langmore; Gintas P Krisciunas; Keri Vasquez Miloro; Steven R Evans; Debbie M Cheng
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Predictors of gastrostomy tube dependence in surgically managed oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Vivek R Varma; Antoine Eskander; Stephen Y Kang; Bhavna Kumar; Nicole V Brown; Songzhu Zhao; Guy Brock; Amit Agrawal; Ricardo L Carrau; Matthew O Old; Enver Ozer; James W Rocco; David E Schuller; Peter T Dziegielewski; Michael J Cipolla; Theodoros N Teknos
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  Comparative effects of different enteral feeding methods in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhihong Zhang; Yu Zhu; Yun Ling; Lijuan Zhang; Hongwei Wan
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Randomised controlled trial of early prophylactic feeding vs standard care in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Teresa E Brown; Merrilyn D Banks; Brett G M Hughes; Charles Y Lin; Lizbeth M Kenny; Judith D Bauer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  The provision of enteral nutritional support during definitive chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Sarah Bishop; Warren Michael Reed
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2015-09-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.