Literature DB >> 19788195

How chain length and charge affect surfactant denaturation of acyl coenzyme A binding protein (ACBP).

Kell K Andersen1, Daniel E Otzen.   

Abstract

Using intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence, equilibria and kinetics of unfolding of acyl coenzyme A binding protein (ACBP) have been investigated in sodium alkyl sulfate surfactants of different chain length (8-16 carbon atoms) and with different proportions of the nonionic surfactant dodecyl maltoside (DDM). The aim has been to determine how surfactant chain length and micellar charge affect the denaturation mechanism. ACBP denatures in two steps irrespective of surfactant chain length, but with increasing chain length, the potency of the denaturant rises more rapidly than the critical micelle concentration (cmc) declines. Increasing proportions of DDM, which significantly reduce the amount of monomeric sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), make the first denaturation step occur at lower concentrations but weaken and eventually remove the second denaturation step. The logarithm of the unfolding rate constants increases linearly with denaturant concentration below the cmc but declines at higher concentrations. Both shortening chain length and decreasing micellar charge reduce the overall kinetics of unfolding and makes the dependence of unfolding rate constants on surfactant concentration more complex. This behavior contrasts with the simplicity of unfolding in chemical denaturants and highlights the changing properties of surfactant micelles. We suggest that the transition from spherical to more elongated micelles leads to inhibition of unfolding kinetics, while weaker binding sites may cause a subsequent rise in unfolding rate constants at higher surfactant concentrations. We propose that shifting micellar binding sites on globular proteins such as ACBP, as opposed to the predefined binding sites on membrane protein surfaces, may lead to nonlinear correlations between activation unfolding energies and SDS mole fraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19788195     DOI: 10.1021/jp905553h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  4 in total

1.  Can a Charged Surfactant Unfold an Uncharged Protein?

Authors:  Casper Højgaard; Henrik Vinther Sørensen; Jan Skov Pedersen; Jakob Rahr Winther; Daniel Erik Otzen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Mass spectrometry--from peripheral proteins to membrane motors.

Authors:  Nina Morgner; Felipe Montenegro; Nelson P Barrera; Carol V Robinson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  The anionic biosurfactant rhamnolipid does not denature industrial enzymes.

Authors:  Jens K Madsen; Rasmus Pihl; Anders H Møller; Anne T Madsen; Daniel E Otzen; Kell K Andersen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  An integrative toolbox to unlock the structure and dynamics of protein-surfactant complexes.

Authors:  Adrian Sanchez-Fernandez; Carl Diehl; Judith E Houston; Anna E Leung; James P Tellam; Sarah E Rogers; Sylvain Prevost; Stefan Ulvenlund; Helen Sjögren; Marie Wahlgren
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2020-07-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.