Literature DB >> 19787843

How hospitals confront new technology.

Molly Joel Coye, Jason Kell.   

Abstract

Hospital technology decision makers now confront a growing pipeline of information technology (IT) and major medical equipment that challenges traditional capital allocation processes. In a highly fragmented industry that is driven by coverage and reimbursement policies set by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and private insurers, the cumulative impact of hospitals' technology investment decisions shapes health care for decades.We propose a framework for the development of a national collaboration for the planning and assessment of emerging technologies, designed to improve the quality and efficiency of hospital decisions. Broader application of technology assessment would restrain inappropriate technology adoption and use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 19787843     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.1.163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  11 in total

1.  Analyzing workflow in emergency departments to prepare for health information exchange.

Authors:  Beth E Friedmann; Jason S Shapiro; Joseph Kannry; Gilad Kuperman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

2.  Electronic medical records for a rural family practice: a case study in systems development.

Authors:  Liam O'Neill; William Klepack
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 3.  Health technology funding decision-making processes around the world: the same, yet different.

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Donald J Philippon; Christopher McCabe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Decision Making on Medical Innovations in a Changing Health Care Environment: Insights from Accountable Care Organizations and Payers on Personalized Medicine and Other Technologies.

Authors:  Julia R Trosman; Christine B Weldon; Michael P Douglas; Patricia A Deverka; John B Watkins; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  Transthoracic echocardiography and mortality in sepsis: analysis of the MIMIC-III database.

Authors:  Mengling Feng; Jakob I McSparron; Dang Trung Kien; David J Stone; David H Roberts; Richard M Schwartzstein; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Leo Anthony Celi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Utilization trend and regimens of hypofractionated whole breast radiation therapy in the United States.

Authors:  Yasmin Hasan; Joseph Waller; Katharine Yao; Steven J Chmura; Dezheng Huo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Variation in colectomy rates for benign polyp and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Joceline V Vu; Kyle H Sheetz; Ana C De Roo; Tadd Hiatt; Samantha Hendren
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Adoption of electronic health records: a qualitative study of academic and private physicians and health administrators.

Authors:  L Grabenbauer; R Fraser; J McClay; N Woelfl; C B Thompson; J Cambell; J Windle
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  Use of information and communication technologies to support effective work practice innovation in the health sector: a multi-site study.

Authors:  Johanna I Westbrook; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Kathryn Gibson; Richard Paoloni; Joanne Callen; Andrew Georgiou; Nerida Creswick; Louise Robertson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  What do electronic health record vendors reveal about their products: an analysis of vendor websites.

Authors:  Natalie K Yeung; Alejandro R Jadad; Aviv Shachak
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.