Literature DB >> 19787768

Genetic and epigenetic classifications define clinical phenotypes and determine patient outcomes in colorectal cancer.

J A Sanchez1, L Krumroy, S Plummer, P Aung, A Merkulova, M Skacel, K L DeJulius, E Manilich, J M Church, G Casey, M F Kalady.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A molecular classification of colorectal cancer has been proposed based on microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and mutations in the KRAS and BRAF oncogenes. This study examined the prevalence of these molecular classes, and differences in clinical presentation and outcome.
METHODS: Demographics, tumour characteristics and survival were recorded for 391 subjects with colorectal cancer. Tumour DNA was analysed for MSI (high (MSI-H) or microsatellite stable (MSS)), CIMP (high (CIMP-H) or no (CIMP-neg)) and BRAF and KRAS mutations. Clinical differences between four phenotypes were examined.
RESULTS: Most tumours were MSS/CIMP-neg (69.8 per cent), with a nearly equal distribution of MSI-H/CIMP-H, MSI-H/CIMP-neg and MSS/CIMP-H types. MSS/CIMP-neg tumours were less likely to be poorly differentiated (P = 0.009). CIMP-H tumours were more common in older patients (P < 0.001). MSI-H/CIMP-H tumours had a high frequency of BRAF mutation and a low rate of KRAS mutation; the opposite was true for MSS/CIMP-neg tumours (P < 0.001). The four molecular phenotypes tended towards divergent survival (P = 0.067 for stages 1-III). MSI-H cancers were associated with better disease-free survival (hazard ratio 2.00 (95 per cent confidence interval 1.03 to 3.91); P = 0.040).
CONCLUSION: Colorectal cancers are molecularly and clinically heterogeneous. These different molecular phenotypes may reflect variable prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19787768     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  45 in total

1.  Standards, advances and challenges in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Dimitrios H Roukos; Christos Katsios
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Molecular pathological epidemiology of colorectal neoplasia: an emerging transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary field.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Andrew T Chan; Charles S Fuchs; Edward Giovannucci
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Novel application of structural equation modeling to correlation structure analysis of CpG island methylation in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Noriko Tanaka; Curtis Huttenhower; Katsuhiko Nosho; Yoshifumi Baba; Kaori Shima; John Quackenbush; Kevin M Haigis; Edward Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Differential clinicopathological features in microsatellite instability-positive colorectal cancers depending on CIMP status.

Authors:  Jeong Mo Bae; Mi Jung Kim; Jung Ho Kim; Jae Moon Koh; Nam-Yun Cho; Tae-You Kim; Gyeong Hoon Kang
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Prediagnostic smoking history, alcohol consumption, and colorectal cancer survival: the Seattle Colon Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Amanda I Phipps; John Baron; Polly A Newcomb
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Serrated Polyps and Serrated Polyposis Syndrome.

Authors:  Jean H Ashburn; Thomas P Plesec; Matthew F Kalady
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-12

7.  Distribution of colorectal cancer in young African Americans: implications for the choice of screening test.

Authors:  Tarek H Hassab; Lior Segev; Matthew F Kalady; James M Church
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Colon and rectal cancer survival by tumor location and microsatellite instability: the Colon Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Amanda I Phipps; Noralane M Lindor; Mark A Jenkins; John A Baron; Aung Ko Win; Steven Gallinger; Robert Gryfe; Polly A Newcomb
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Copy number alterations in prostate tumors and disease aggressiveness.

Authors:  Iona Cheng; Albert M Levin; Yu Chuan Tai; Sarah Plummer; Gary K Chen; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Graham Casey; Benjamin A Rybicki; John S Witte
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 10.  A review of the most promising biomarkers in colorectal cancer: one step closer to targeted therapy.

Authors:  Vanessa Deschoolmeester; Marc Baay; Pol Specenier; Filip Lardon; Jan B Vermorken
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.