Literature DB >> 19787625

Evaluation of cell-free DNA in urine as a marker for bladder cancer diagnosis.

Matelda Zancan1, Francesca Galdi, Fulvio Di Tonno, Chiara Mazzariol, Claudio Orlando, Francesca Malentacchi, Marco Agostini, Michela Maran, Paola Del Bianco, Aline S C Fabricio, Bruno Murer, Carlo Pianon, Massimo Gion.   

Abstract

The diagnosis and follow-up of bladder cancer are mainly based on cystoscopy, an invasive method which could be negative in case of flat malignancies such as carcinoma in situ. Other noninvasive diagnostic methods have not yet given satisfactory results. There is a need for a reliable yet noninvasive method for the detection of bladder cancer. Our aim was to investigate whether cell-free DNA quantified in urine (ucf-DNA) could be a useful marker for the diagnosis of bladder cancer. A standard urine test was performed in 150 naturally voided morning urine samples that were processed to obtain a quantitative evaluation of ucf-DNA. Leukocyturia and/or bacteriuria were found in 18 subjects, who were excluded from the study. Statistical analysis was performed on 45 bladder cancer patients and 87 healthy subjects. Ucf-DNA was extracted from urine samples by a spin column-based method and quantified using four different methods: GeneQuant Pro (Amersham Biosciences, Pittsburg, PA, USA), Quant-iT DNA high-sensitivity assay kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), Real-Time PCR (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and NanoDrop 1000 (NanoDrop Technologies, Houston, TX, USA). Median free DNA quantification did not differ statistically between bladder cancer patients and healthy subjects. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was developed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ucf-DNA quantification for each method. The area under the ROC curve was 0.578 for GeneQuant Pro, 0.573 for the Quant-iT DNA high-sensitivity assay kit, 0.507 for Real-Time PCR, and 0.551 for NanoDrop 1000, which indicated that ucf-DNA quantification by these methods is not able to discriminate between the presence and absence of bladder cancer. No association was found between ucf-DNA quantification and tumor size or tumor focality. In conclusion, ucf-DNA isolated by a spin column-based method and quantified by GeneQuant Pro, Quant-iT DNA high-sensitivity assay kit, Real-Time PCR or NanoDrop 1000 does not seem to be a reliable marker for the diagnosis of bladder cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19787625     DOI: 10.1177/172460080902400304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Markers        ISSN: 0393-6155            Impact factor:   3.248


  13 in total

1.  New method to preserve the original proportion and integrity of urinary cell-free DNA.

Authors:  Pei Li; Jun Ning; Xipeng Luo; Hongli Du; Qing Zhang; Ganlin Zhou; Qiu Du; Zhenyu Ou; Long Wang; Yu Wang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-09-02       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Mass spectrometric based analysis, characterization and applications of circulating cell free DNA isolated from human body fluids.

Authors:  Vaneet K Sharma; Paul Vouros; James Glick
Journal:  Int J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 3.  Current and Emerging Applications of Droplet Digital PCR in Oncology.

Authors:  Susana Olmedillas-López; Mariano García-Arranz; Damián García-Olmo
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.074

4.  6-gene promoter methylation assay is potentially applicable for prostate cancer clinical staging based on urine collection following prostatic massage.

Authors:  Kostyantyn A Nekrasov; Mark V Vikarchuk; Evgeniya E Rudenko; Igor V Ivanitskiy; Viacheslav M Grygorenko; Rostyslav O Danylets; Alexander G Kondratov; Liubov A Stoliar; Bizhan R Sharopov; Volodymyr I Kashuba
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 5.  Clinical applications of urinary cell-free DNA in cancer: current insights and promising future.

Authors:  Tian Lu; Jinming Li
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.166

6.  Genome-wide promoter methylation profile of human testis and epididymis: identified from cell-free seminal DNA.

Authors:  Chunlin Wu; Xiaofang Ding; Honggang Li; Changhong Zhu; Chengliang Xiong
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Urinary Nucleic Acid TSPAN13-to-S100A9 Ratio as a Diagnostic Marker in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Chunri Yan; Ye-Hwan Kim; Ho Won Kang; Sung Phil Seo; Pildu Jeong; Il-Seok Lee; Dongho Kim; Jung Min Kim; Yung Hyun Choi; Sung-Kwon Moon; Seok Joong Yun; Wun-Jae Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Urine cell-free DNA integrity as a marker for early prostate cancer diagnosis: a pilot study.

Authors:  Valentina Casadio; Daniele Calistri; Samanta Salvi; Roberta Gunelli; Elisa Carretta; Dino Amadori; Rosella Silvestrini; Wainer Zoli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Urine Cell-Free DNA Integrity Analysis for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Samanta Salvi; Giorgia Gurioli; Filippo Martignano; Flavia Foca; Roberta Gunelli; Giacomo Cicchetti; Ugo De Giorgi; Wainer Zoli; Daniele Calistri; Valentina Casadio
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.434

Review 10.  Cell-free DNA as a diagnostic marker for cancer: current insights.

Authors:  Samanta Salvi; Giorgia Gurioli; Ugo De Giorgi; Vincenza Conteduca; Gianluca Tedaldi; Daniele Calistri; Valentina Casadio
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.