Literature DB >> 19787278

G2-checkpoint abrogation in irradiated lymphocytes: A new cytogenetic approach to assess individual radiosensitivity and predisposition to cancer.

Georgia I Terzoudi1, Vasiliki I Hatzi, Katarzyna Barszczewska, Kalliopi N Manola, Chryssa Stavropoulou, Philip Angelakis, Gabriel E Pantelias.   

Abstract

Increased yield of chromatid breaks, following in vitro G2-phase lymphocyte irradiation, can be a marker of individual radiosensitivity and cancer predisposing genes whose role is to respond to DNA damage. Mutations or polymorphisms of genes encoding DNA repair pathways may underlie the increased chromosomal radiosensitivity. However, genes that facilitate DNA damage recognition, using signal transduction pathways to activate cell cycle arrest and preserve genomic integrity, are perhaps the most important determinant. Based on the latter hypothesis, an individual radiosensitivity parameter (IRP) is introduced, which expresses, at individual level, the G2-checkpoint potential to facilitate DNA damage recognition and repair of radiation-induced chromosomal damage during G2 to M-phase transition. Based on this parameter a new methodology for assessment of individual radiosensitivity is proposed, which involves G2-checkpoint abrogation by caffeine to obtain the IRP values. To evaluate the proposed methodology, blood samples from 52 healthy donors were taken for inter-individual radiosensitivity analysis using both the conventional G2 chromosomal radiosensitivity assay as well as the new approach using caffeine-induced G2-checkpoint abrogation. The two assays were compared in experiments using samples from 5 hypersensitive patients, 3 AT-homozygotes, 3 AT-heterozygotes, and the GM15786, GM03188A, GM09899, HCC1937 and MCF-7 cell lines. Using the G2 chromosomal radiosensitivity assay, donors are predicted as G2 radiosensitive or normal, while according to the new approach, individuals can be classified as highly radiosensitive, radiosensitive, normal, radioresistant and highly radioresistant. Overall, the new approach provides better individual radiosensitivity discrimination and intra-experimental reproducibility. Therefore, the proposed methodology using IRP values may provide a clinically applicable predictive assay for individual radiosensitivity and predisposition to cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19787278     DOI: 10.3892/ijo_00000439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oncol        ISSN: 1019-6439            Impact factor:   5.650


  8 in total

1.  The radiosensitizing potential of glutaraldehyde on MCF7 breast cancer cells as quantified by means of the G2-chromosomal radiosensitivity assay.

Authors:  Vasiliki I Hatzi; Georgia I Terzoudi; Katarzyna Barszczewska; Vasilios Makropoulos; Gabriel E Pantelias
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 2.  Improving Patients' Life Quality after Radiotherapy Treatment by Predicting Late Toxicities.

Authors:  Ariane Lapierre; Laura Bourillon; Marion Larroque; Tiphany Gouveia; Céline Bourgier; Mahmut Ozsahin; André Pèlegrin; David Azria; Muriel Brengues
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Variant ataxia telangiectasia: clinical and molecular findings and evaluation of radiosensitive phenotypes in a patient and relatives.

Authors:  Kathleen Claes; Julie Depuydt; A Malcolm R Taylor; James I Last; Annelot Baert; Peter Schietecatte; Veerle Vandersickel; Bruce Poppe; Kim De Leeneer; Marc D'Hooghe; Anne Vral
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.843

4.  Individual Radiosensitivity Assessment of the Families of Ataxia-Telangiectasia Patients by G2-Checkpoint Abrogation.

Authors:  Asghar Aghamohammadi; Seyed M Akrami; Marjan Yaghmaie; Nima Rezaei; Gholamreza Azizi; Mehdi Yaseri; Hassan Nosrati; Majid Zaki-Dizaji
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2019-03-28

5.  A new model of biodosimetry to integrate low and high doses.

Authors:  Mònica Pujol; Joan-Francesc Barquinero; Pedro Puig; Roser Puig; María Rosa Caballín; Leonardo Barrios
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Data-Based Radiation Oncology: Design of Clinical Trials in the Toxicity Biomarkers Era.

Authors:  David Azria; Ariane Lapierre; Sophie Gourgou; Dirk De Ruysscher; Jacques Colinge; Philippe Lambin; Muriel Brengues; Tim Ward; Søren M Bentzen; Hubert Thierens; Tiziana Rancati; Christopher J Talbot; Ana Vega; Sarah L Kerns; Christian Nicolaj Andreassen; Jenny Chang-Claude; Catharine M L West; Corey M Gill; Barry S Rosenstein
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Individual Radiosensitivity in Oncological Patients: Linking Adverse Normal Tissue Reactions and Genetic Features.

Authors:  Elisa Palumbo; Celeste Piotto; Enrica Calura; Elena Fasanaro; Elena Groff; Fabio Busato; Badr El Khouzai; Michele Rigo; Laura Baggio; Chiara Romualdi; Demetre Zafiropoulos; Antonella Russo; Maddalena Mognato; Luigi Corti
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  G2/M Checkpoint Abrogation With Selective Inhibitors Results in Increased Chromatid Breaks and Radiosensitization of 82-6 hTERT and RPE Human Cells.

Authors:  Aggeliki Nikolakopoulou; Aashish Soni; Martha Habibi; Pantelis Karaiskos; Gabriel Pantelias; Georgia I Terzoudi; George Iliakis
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-05-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.