AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the current role of (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy in the detection and follow-up of patients with paragangliomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 117 patients were referred for diagnostic (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy based on a strong clinical suspicion, positive familial history and genetic testing, or for follow-up of paragangliomas.(123)I-MIBG images were analyzed and correlated with (111)In-octreotide scintigraphy, CT or MRI results. Accuracy of the imaging method was calculated per patient and per tumor per site. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients were referred for (123)I-MIBG diagnostic imaging; 80 patients were diagnosed with paraganglioma; 66 patients had a single neuroendocrine tumor and 14 patients multiple tumors. The total number of all lesions in these patients was 172. (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy demonstrated 65 lesions in 56 patients (overall sensitivity: 56.3%, specificity: 84%). Lesion-per-site analysis revealed that sensitivity and specificity significantly varied per tumor site (lowest sensitivity for the head and neck: 17.5% and lowest specificity for the abdomen: 87.5%). Hormones were elevated in 85 patients: 55 (123)I-MIBG tumors were positive and 35 tumors were negative. In 16 patients (13.7%) with a genetic burden and a single neuroendocrine tumor, (123)I-MIBG whole-body imaging was successful at detecting a second tumor. In 2 patients (1.7%) with paragangliomas, (123)I-MIBG unexpectedly detected metastases, so the restaging was properly done. CONCLUSION: (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy remains important in pheochromocytoma and functioning neuroendocrine tumors. The value of (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy is high in familial syndromes with multiple neuroendocrine tumors at different sites, multifocal tumors, and relapsing and metastatic disease. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.
AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the current role of (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy in the detection and follow-up of patients with paragangliomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 117 patients were referred for diagnostic (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy based on a strong clinical suspicion, positive familial history and genetic testing, or for follow-up of paragangliomas.(123)I-MIBG images were analyzed and correlated with (111)In-octreotide scintigraphy, CT or MRI results. Accuracy of the imaging method was calculated per patient and per tumor per site. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients were referred for (123)I-MIBG diagnostic imaging; 80 patients were diagnosed with paraganglioma; 66 patients had a single neuroendocrine tumor and 14 patientsmultiple tumors. The total number of all lesions in these patients was 172. (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy demonstrated 65 lesions in 56 patients (overall sensitivity: 56.3%, specificity: 84%). Lesion-per-site analysis revealed that sensitivity and specificity significantly varied per tumor site (lowest sensitivity for the head and neck: 17.5% and lowest specificity for the abdomen: 87.5%). Hormones were elevated in 85 patients: 55 (123)I-MIBGtumors were positive and 35 tumors were negative. In 16 patients (13.7%) with a genetic burden and a single neuroendocrine tumor, (123)I-MIBG whole-body imaging was successful at detecting a second tumor. In 2 patients (1.7%) with paragangliomas, (123)I-MIBG unexpectedly detected metastases, so the restaging was properly done. CONCLUSION: (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy remains important in pheochromocytoma and functioning neuroendocrine tumors. The value of (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy is high in familial syndromes with multiple neuroendocrine tumors at different sites, multifocal tumors, and relapsing and metastatic disease. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Kathryn S King; Clara C Chen; Dimitrios K Alexopoulos; Millie A Whatley; James C Reynolds; Nicholas Patronas; Alexander Ling; Karen T Adams; Paraskevi Xekouki; Howard Lando; Constantine A Stratakis; Karel Pacak Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Giovanni Alemanno; Carlo Bergamini; Riccardo Somigli; Paolo Prosperi; Alessandro Bruscino; Andrea Valeri Journal: Updates Surg Date: 2017-05-23
Authors: Ilona Michałowska; Jarosław Ćwikła; Aleksander Prejbisz; Paweł Kwiatek; Małgorzata Szperl; Wojciech Michalski; Lucjan Wyrwicz; Mariusz Kuśmierczyk; Andrzej Januszewicz; Anna Maciejczyk; Marta Roszczynko; Mariola Pęczkowska Journal: Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol Date: 2016-09-30
Authors: Juan C Baez; Jyothi P Jagannathan; Katherine Krajewski; Kevin O'Regan; Katherine Zukotynski; Matthew Kulke; Nikhil H Ramaiya Journal: Cancer Imaging Date: 2012-05-07 Impact factor: 3.909