Linda J Harrison1, Sharynne McLeod. 1. Charles Sturt University, Panorama Avenue, Bathurst, NSW, 2795, Australia. lharrison@csu.edu.au
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine risk and protective factors for speech and language impairment in early childhood. METHOD: Data are presented for a nationally representative sample of 4,983 children participating in the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (described in McLeod & Harrison, 2009). Thirty-one child, parent, family, and community factors previously reported as being predictors of speech and language impairment were tested as predictors of (a) parent-rated expressive speech/language concern and (b) receptive language concern, (c) use of speech-language pathology services, and (d) low receptive vocabulary. RESULTS: Bivariate logistic regression analyses confirmed 29 of the identified factors. However, when tested concurrently with other predictors in multivariate analyses, only 19 remained significant: 9 for 2-4 outcomes and 10 for 1 outcome. Consistent risk factors were being male, having ongoing hearing problems, and having a more reactive temperament. Protective factors were having a more persistent and sociable temperament and higher levels of maternal well-being. Results differed by outcome for having an older sibling, parents speaking a language other than English, and parental support for children's learning at home. CONCLUSION: Identification of children requiring speech and language assessment requires consideration of the context of family life as well as biological and psychosocial factors intrinsic to the child.
PURPOSE: To determine risk and protective factors for speech and language impairment in early childhood. METHOD: Data are presented for a nationally representative sample of 4,983 children participating in the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (described in McLeod & Harrison, 2009). Thirty-one child, parent, family, and community factors previously reported as being predictors of speech and language impairment were tested as predictors of (a) parent-rated expressive speech/language concern and (b) receptive language concern, (c) use of speech-language pathology services, and (d) low receptive vocabulary. RESULTS: Bivariate logistic regression analyses confirmed 29 of the identified factors. However, when tested concurrently with other predictors in multivariate analyses, only 19 remained significant: 9 for 2-4 outcomes and 10 for 1 outcome. Consistent risk factors were being male, having ongoing hearing problems, and having a more reactive temperament. Protective factors were having a more persistent and sociable temperament and higher levels of maternal well-being. Results differed by outcome for having an older sibling, parents speaking a language other than English, and parental support for children's learning at home. CONCLUSION: Identification of children requiring speech and language assessment requires consideration of the context of family life as well as biological and psychosocial factors intrinsic to the child.
Authors: Paul L Morgan; Carol Scheffner Hammer; George Farkas; Marianne M Hillemeier; Steve Maczuga; Michael Cook; Stephanie Morano Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2016-05-01 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Barbara A Lewis; Lisa Freebairn; Jessica Tag; Allison A Ciesla; Sudha K Iyengar; Catherine M Stein; H Gerry Taylor Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Teresa Y C Ching; Kathryn Crowe; Vivienne Martin; Julia Day; Nicole Mahler; Samantha Youn; Laura Street; Cassandra Cook; Julia Orsini Journal: Int J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.484
Authors: Ragnhild B Nes; Lars J Hauge; Tom Kornstad; Markus A Landolt; Lorentz Irgens; Leif Eskedal; Petter Kristensen; Margarete E Vollrath Journal: J Marriage Fam Date: 2015-06-25
Authors: Lawrence D Shriberg; Marios Fourakis; Sheryl D Hall; Heather B Karlsson; Heather L Lohmeier; Jane L McSweeny; Nancy L Potter; Alison R Scheer-Cohen; Edythe A Strand; Christie M Tilkens; David L Wilson Journal: Clin Linguist Phon Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 1.346
Authors: Carol Scheffner Hammer; Paul Morgan; George Farkas; Marianne Hillemeier; Dana Bitetti; Steve Maczuga Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 2.297