OBJECTIVE: We developed a program for training in the diagnosis of otitis media that included images illustrating various otoscopic findings, mnemonic guides to recollection, and discrimination sessions that included feedback and assessments of diagnostic skills. METHODS: We prepared a computerized, interactive curriculum, Enhancing Proficiency in Otitis Media (ePROM), that was centered around assemblages of clinically diverse, still and video images of tympanic membranes (TMs). To assess curriculum effectiveness, we constructed a test, the Diagnostic Ear Assessment Resource, that consisted of 50 video TM images. We administered the test to 84 residents in pediatrics or family practice who had not been exposed to ePROM and, varying the order in which the images were presented, to another group of 102 residents in the same programs both before and after exposure to ePROM. RESULTS: o Mean proportions of correct diagnoses in the Diagnostic Ear Assessment Resource were larger among residents who had been exposed to ePROM than among residents at comparable levels of training who had not been exposed (67% vs 62%; P = .007). Among residents exposed to ePROM, mean proportions of correct diagnoses were larger after exposure than before (67% vs 55%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: A structured, computerized curriculum to supplement standard clinical training can enhance residents' abilities to interpret still and video images of TMs and may improve their skills in diagnosing otitis media.
OBJECTIVE: We developed a program for training in the diagnosis of otitis media that included images illustrating various otoscopic findings, mnemonic guides to recollection, and discrimination sessions that included feedback and assessments of diagnostic skills. METHODS: We prepared a computerized, interactive curriculum, Enhancing Proficiency in Otitis Media (ePROM), that was centered around assemblages of clinically diverse, still and video images of tympanic membranes (TMs). To assess curriculum effectiveness, we constructed a test, the Diagnostic Ear Assessment Resource, that consisted of 50 video TM images. We administered the test to 84 residents in pediatrics or family practice who had not been exposed to ePROM and, varying the order in which the images were presented, to another group of 102 residents in the same programs both before and after exposure to ePROM. RESULTS: o Mean proportions of correct diagnoses in the Diagnostic Ear Assessment Resource were larger among residents who had been exposed to ePROM than among residents at comparable levels of training who had not been exposed (67% vs 62%; P = .007). Among residents exposed to ePROM, mean proportions of correct diagnoses were larger after exposure than before (67% vs 55%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: A structured, computerized curriculum to supplement standard clinical training can enhance residents' abilities to interpret still and video images of TMs and may improve their skills in diagnosing otitis media.
Authors: Alejandro Hoberman; Jack L Paradise; Howard E Rockette; Diana H Kearney; Sonika Bhatnagar; Timothy R Shope; Judith M Martin; Marcia Kurs-Lasky; Susan J Copelli; D Kathleen Colborn; Stan L Block; John J Labella; Thomas G Lynch; Norman L Cohen; MaryAnn Haralam; Marcia A Pope; Jennifer P Nagg; Michael D Green; Nader Shaikh Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alejandro Hoberman; Jack L Paradise; Howard E Rockette; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Diana H Kearney; Sonika Bhatnagar; Timothy R Shope; Gysella Muñiz; Judith M Martin; Marcia Kurs-Lasky; MaryAnn Haralam; Marcia A Pope; Jennifer P Nagg; Wenchen Zhao; Mohammad Kowser Miah; Jan Beumer; Raman Venkataramanan; Nader Shaikh Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-06-27 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Alejandro Hoberman; Diego Preciado; Jack L Paradise; David H Chi; MaryAnn Haralam; Stan L Block; Diana H Kearney; Sonika Bhatnagar; Gysella B Muñiz Pujalt; Timothy R Shope; Judith M Martin; Daniel E Felten; Marcia Kurs-Lasky; Hui Liu; Kristin Yahner; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman L Cohen; Brian Czervionke; Jennifer P Nagg; Joseph E Dohar; Nader Shaikh Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rustin G Kashani; Marcel C Młyńczak; David Zarabanda; Paola Solis-Pazmino; David M Huland; Iram N Ahmad; Surya P Singh; Tulio A Valdez Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Anne G M Schilder; Tasnee Chonmaitree; Allan W Cripps; Richard M Rosenfeld; Margaretha L Casselbrant; Mark P Haggard; Roderick P Venekamp Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 52.329