Literature DB >> 19786404

The addition of an upper-extremity curriculum in medical school education and its assessment.

C S Day1, C S Ahn, Y Yu.   

Abstract

This study assessed the impact of changes made to address the inadequate upper-extremity education through preclinical medical school curriculum reform. After the administration of a new upper-extremity curriculum, which also increased the time devoted to three preclinical medical school courses from 7.25 to 21.25 hours, second-year medical students were evaluated for mastery of these concepts through a national validated objective examination, and attitude and skill through clinical confidence and subjective surveys. After implementation of the new upper-extremity curriculum, students had significantly greater confidence in their ability to perform a physical examination but not in identifying differential diagnoses of the upper-extremity. Students were more satisfied with the amount of time spent on the musculoskeletal system but their performance in the national examination did not change.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19786404     DOI: 10.1177/1753193409347500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol        ISSN: 0266-7681


  2 in total

1.  Differentiating c8-t1 radiculopathy from ulnar neuropathy: a survey of 24 spine surgeons.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Stoker; Han Jo Kim; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2013-08-28

2.  Early musculoskeletal classroom education confers little advantage to medical student knowledge and competency in the absence of clinical experiences: a retrospective comparison study.

Authors:  Derek Khorsand; Ansab Khwaja; Gregory A Schmale
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.463

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.