BACKGROUND: Malaria transmission in Africa occurs predominantly inside houses where the primary vectors prefer to feed. Human preference and investment in blocking of specific entry points for mosquitoes into houses was evaluated and compared with known entry point preferences of the mosquitoes themselves. METHODS: Cross-sectional household surveys were conducted in urban Dar es Salaam, Tanzania to estimate usage levels of available options for house proofing against mosquito entry, namely window screens, ceilings and blocking of eaves. These surveys also enabled evaluation of household expenditure on screens and ceilings and the motivation behind their installation. RESULTS: Over three quarters (82.8%) of the 579 houses surveyed in Dar es Salaam had window screens, while almost half (48.9%) had ceilings. Prevention of mosquito entry was cited as a reason for installation of window screens and ceilings by 91.4% (394/431) and 55.7% (127/228) of respondents, respectively, but prevention of malaria was rarely cited (4.3%, 22/508). The median cost of window screens was between US $ 21-30 while that of ceilings was between US $301-400. The market value of insecticide-treated nets, window screening and ceilings currently in use in the city was estimated as 2, 5 and 42 million US$. More than three quarters of the respondents that lacked them said it was too expensive to install ceilings (82.2%) or window screens (75.5%). CONCLUSION: High coverage and spending on screens and ceilings implies that these techniques are highly acceptable and excellent uptake can be achieved in urban settings like Dar es Salaam. Effective models for promotion and subsidization should be developed and evaluated, particularly for installation of ceilings that prevent entry via the eaves, which are the most important entry point for mosquitoes that cause malaria, a variety of neglected tropical diseases and the nuisance which motivates uptake.
BACKGROUND:Malaria transmission in Africa occurs predominantly inside houses where the primary vectors prefer to feed. Human preference and investment in blocking of specific entry points for mosquitoes into houses was evaluated and compared with known entry point preferences of the mosquitoes themselves. METHODS: Cross-sectional household surveys were conducted in urban Dar es Salaam, Tanzania to estimate usage levels of available options for house proofing against mosquito entry, namely window screens, ceilings and blocking of eaves. These surveys also enabled evaluation of household expenditure on screens and ceilings and the motivation behind their installation. RESULTS: Over three quarters (82.8%) of the 579 houses surveyed in Dar es Salaam had window screens, while almost half (48.9%) had ceilings. Prevention of mosquito entry was cited as a reason for installation of window screens and ceilings by 91.4% (394/431) and 55.7% (127/228) of respondents, respectively, but prevention of malaria was rarely cited (4.3%, 22/508). The median cost of window screens was between US $ 21-30 while that of ceilings was between US $301-400. The market value of insecticide-treated nets, window screening and ceilings currently in use in the city was estimated as 2, 5 and 42 million US$. More than three quarters of the respondents that lacked them said it was too expensive to install ceilings (82.2%) or window screens (75.5%). CONCLUSION: High coverage and spending on screens and ceilings implies that these techniques are highly acceptable and excellent uptake can be achieved in urban settings like Dar es Salaam. Effective models for promotion and subsidization should be developed and evaluated, particularly for installation of ceilings that prevent entry via the eaves, which are the most important entry point for mosquitoes that cause malaria, a variety of neglected tropical diseases and the nuisance which motivates uptake.
Authors: Matthew J Kirby; David Ameh; Christian Bottomley; Clare Green; Musa Jawara; Paul J Milligan; Paul C Snell; David J Conway; Steve W Lindsay Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-09-03 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: D A Diallo; S N Cousens; N Cuzin-Ouattara; I Nebié; E Ilboudo-Sanogo; F Esposito Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2004-03-16 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Yvonne Geissbühler; Khadija Kannady; Prosper Pius Chaki; Basiliana Emidi; Nicodem James Govella; Valeliana Mayagaya; Michael Kiama; Deo Mtasiwa; Hassan Mshinda; Steven William Lindsay; Marcel Tanner; Ulrike Fillinger; Marcia Caldas de Castro; Gerry Francis Killeen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Gerry F Killeen; Tom A Smith; Heather M Ferguson; Hassan Mshinda; Salim Abdulla; Christian Lengeler; Steven P Kachur Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Stefan Dongus; Dickson Nyika; Khadija Kannady; Deo Mtasiwa; Hassan Mshinda; Ulrike Fillinger; Axel W Drescher; Marcel Tanner; Marcia C Castro; Gerry F Killeen Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 3.918
Authors: Felicity J Burt; Antoinette A Grobbelaar; Patricia A Leman; Fiona S Anthony; Georgina V F Gibson; Robert Swanepoel Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Priscille Barreaux; Antoine M G Barreaux; Eleanore D Sternberg; Eunho Suh; Jessica L Waite; Shelley A Whitehead; Matthew B Thomas Journal: Trends Parasitol Date: 2017-06-28
Authors: Sheila B Ogoma; Dickson W Lweitoijera; Hassan Ngonyani; Benjamin Furer; Tanya L Russell; Wolfgang R Mukabana; Gerry F Killeen; Sarah J Moore Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2010-08-03
Authors: Matthew J Kirby; Pateh Bah; Caroline O H Jones; Ann H Kelly; Momodou Jasseh; Steve W Lindsay Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Steven W Lindsay; Michael Davies; Graham Alabaster; Hector Altamirano; Ebrima Jatta; Musa Jawara; Majo Carrasco-Tenezaca; Lorenz von Seidlein; Fiona C Shenton; Lucy S Tusting; Anne L Wilson; Jakob Knudsen Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2020-12-28 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Prosper P Chaki; Yeromin Mlacha; Daniel Msellemu; Athuman Muhili; Alpha D Malishee; Zacharia J Mtema; Samson S Kiware; Ying Zhou; Neil F Lobo; Tanya L Russell; Stefan Dongus; Nicodem J Govella; Gerry F Killeen Journal: Malar J Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 2.979