BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: ABC multidrug transporters (MDR-ABC proteins) cause multiple drug resistance in cancer and may be involved in the decreased anti-cancer efficiency and modified pharmacological properties of novel specifically targeted agents. It has been documented that ABCB1 and ABCG2 interact with several first-generation, small-molecule, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including the Bcr-Abl fusion kinase inhibitor imatinib, used for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia. Here, we have investigated the specific interaction of these transporters with nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib, three clinically used, second-generation inhibitors of the Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase activity. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: MDR-ABC transporter function was screened in both membrane- and cell-based (K562 cells) systems. Cytotoxicity measurements in Bcr-Abl-positive model cells were coupled with direct determination of intracellular TKI concentrations by high-pressure liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and analysis of the pattern of Bcr-Abl phosphorylation. Transporter function in membranes was assessed by ATPase activity. KEY RESULTS: Nilotinib and dasatinib were high-affinity substrates of ABCG2, and this protein mediated an effective resistance in cancer cells against these compounds. Nilotinib and dasatinib also interacted with ABCB1, but this transporter provided resistance only against dasatinib. Neither ABCB1 nor ABCG2 induced resistance to bosutinib. At relatively higher concentrations, however, each TKI inhibited both transporters. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: A combination of in vitro assays may provide valuable preclinical information for the applicability of novel targeted anti-cancer TKIs, even in multidrug-resistant cancer. The pattern of MDR-ABC transporter-TKI interactions may also help to understand the general pharmacokinetics and toxicities of new TKIs.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: ABC multidrug transporters (MDR-ABC proteins) cause multiple drug resistance in cancer and may be involved in the decreased anti-cancer efficiency and modified pharmacological properties of novel specifically targeted agents. It has been documented that ABCB1 and ABCG2 interact with several first-generation, small-molecule, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including the Bcr-Abl fusion kinase inhibitor imatinib, used for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia. Here, we have investigated the specific interaction of these transporters with nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib, three clinically used, second-generation inhibitors of the Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase activity. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: MDR-ABC transporter function was screened in both membrane- and cell-based (K562 cells) systems. Cytotoxicity measurements in Bcr-Abl-positive model cells were coupled with direct determination of intracellular TKI concentrations by high-pressure liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and analysis of the pattern of Bcr-Abl phosphorylation. Transporter function in membranes was assessed by ATPase activity. KEY RESULTS: Nilotinib and dasatinib were high-affinity substrates of ABCG2, and this protein mediated an effective resistance in cancer cells against these compounds. Nilotinib and dasatinib also interacted with ABCB1, but this transporter provided resistance only against dasatinib. Neither ABCB1 nor ABCG2 induced resistance to bosutinib. At relatively higher concentrations, however, each TKI inhibited both transporters. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: A combination of in vitro assays may provide valuable preclinical information for the applicability of novel targeted anti-cancer TKIs, even in multidrug-resistant cancer. The pattern of MDR-ABC transporter-TKI interactions may also help to understand the general pharmacokinetics and toxicities of new TKIs.
Authors: A Brózik; N P Casey; Cs Hegedus; A Bors; A Kozma; H Andrikovics; M Geiszt; K Német; M Magócsi Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Herman Burger; Hans van Tol; Antonius W M Boersma; Mariël Brok; Erik A C Wiemer; Gerrit Stoter; Kees Nooter Journal: Blood Date: 2004-07-13 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Peter J Houghton; Glen S Germain; Franklin C Harwood; John D Schuetz; Clinton F Stewart; Elisabeth Buchdunger; Peter Traxler Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Heather G Jørgensen; Elaine K Allan; Niove E Jordanides; Joanne C Mountford; Tessa L Holyoake Journal: Blood Date: 2007-01-09 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: C Brendel; C Scharenberg; M Dohse; R W Robey; S E Bates; S Shukla; S V Ambudkar; Y Wang; G Wennemuth; A Burchert; U Boudriot; A Neubauer Journal: Leukemia Date: 2007-03-22 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Maitreyee Hazarika; Xiaoping Jiang; Qi Liu; Shwu-Luan Lee; Roshni Ramchandani; Christine Garnett; Micheal S Orr; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Brian Booth; John K Leighton; William Timmer; Ravi Harapanhalli; Ramzi Dagher; Robert Justice; Richard Pazdur Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-09-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Cristóbal Aguilar-Gallardo; Emily Cecilia Rutledge; Ana M Martínez-Arroyo; Juan José Hidalgo; Santiago Domingo; Carlos Simón Journal: Stem Cell Rev Rep Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 5.739
Authors: Kunyu Shen; David W Johnson; David A Vesey; Michael A McGuckin; Glenda C Gobe Journal: Cell Stress Chaperones Date: 2017-09-27 Impact factor: 3.667
Authors: Luciene Terezina de Lima; Douglas Vivona; Carolina Tosin Bueno; Rosario D C Hirata; Mario H Hirata; André D Luchessi; Fabíola Attié de Castro; Maria de Lourdes F Chauffaille; Maria A Zanichelli; Carlos S Chiattone; Vania T M Hungria; Elvira M Guerra-Shinohara Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2014-01-29 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Devendra K Hiwase; Verity A Saunders; Eva Nievergall; Douglas D Ross; Deborah L White; Timothy P Hughes Journal: Haematologica Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 9.941