Literature DB >> 19785580

Does rural residence affect access to prenatal care in Oregon?

Beth Epstein1, Therese Grant, Melissa Schiff, Laurin Kasehagen.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Identifying how maternal residential location affects late initiation of prenatal care is important for policy planning and allocation of resources for intervention.
PURPOSE: To determine how rural residence and other social and demographic characteristics affect late initiation of prenatal care, and how residence status is associated with self-reported barriers to accessing early prenatal care.
METHODS: This observational study used data from the 2003 Oregon Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) (N = 1,508), with late initiation of prenatal care (after the first trimester) as the primary outcome. We used Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes to categorize maternal residence as urban, large rural, or small/isolated rural. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate whether category of residence was associated with late initiation of prenatal care after adjusting for other maternal factors. Association between categories of barriers to prenatal care and maternal category of residence were determined using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test of association.
FINDINGS: We found no significant association between residence category and late initiation of prenatal care, or residence category and barriers to prenatal care initiation. Urban women tended to be over age 34 or nonwhite. Women from large rural areas were more likely to be younger than 18 years, unmarried, and have an unintended pregnancy. Women from small rural areas were more likely to use tobacco during pregnancy.
CONCLUSIONS: Maternal residence category is not associated with late initiation of prenatal care or with barriers to initiation of prenatal care. Differences in maternal risk profiles by location suggest possible new foci for programs, such as tobacco education in small rural areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19785580     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00211.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Health        ISSN: 0890-765X            Impact factor:   4.333


  6 in total

Review 1.  Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Preterm Birth Among American Indian and Alaska Native Women.

Authors:  Greta B Raglan; Sophia M Lannon; Katherine M Jones; Jay Schulkin
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-01

2.  What has geography got to do with it? Using GWR to explore place-specific associations with prenatal care utilization.

Authors:  Carla Shoff; Tse-Chuan Yang; Stephen A Matthews
Journal:  GeoJournal       Date:  2012-06-01

3.  When homogeneity meets heterogeneity: the geographically weighted regression with spatial lag approach to prenatal care utilization.

Authors:  Carla Shoff; Vivian Yi-Ju Chen; Tse-Chuan Yang
Journal:  Geospat Health       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.212

4.  Quality of diabetes mellitus care by rural primary care physicians.

Authors:  Stephen A Tonks; Sohil Makwana; Amanda H Salanitro; Monika M Safford; Thomas K Houston; Jeroan J Allison; William Curry; Carlos A Estrada
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Incarceration Exposure and Barriers to Prenatal Care in the United States: Findings from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

Authors:  Alexander Testa; Dylan B Jackson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Area-level risk factors for adverse birth outcomes: trends in urban and rural settings.

Authors:  Shia T Kent; Leslie A McClure; Ben F Zaitchik; Julia M Gohlke
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.