Literature DB >> 19784522

The Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test: comparative evaluation of analytical specificity and clinical sensitivity for cervical carcinoma and CIN 3 lesions with the Hybrid Capture 2 HPV DNA test.

Mario Poljak1, Anja Kovanda, Bostjan J Kocjan, Katja Seme, Nina Jancar, Eda Vrtacnik-Bokal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test (RealTime) is a novel assay designed to detect 14 high-risk human papillomavirus genotypes (hr-HPV) and concurrently distinguish HPV-16 and HPV-18 from other hr-HPV within a single test.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate analytical specificity and clinical sensitivity for cervical carcinoma and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) of the RealTime test in comparison with the Digene Hybrid Capture II Test (hc2).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analytical specificity of the RealTime assay was evaluated on 37 samples with previously determined hc2 false-positive results due to cross-reactivity of the hc2 high-risk probe cocktail with untargeted low-risk HPV genotypes. All 37 samples were negative for 14 hr-HPV using the RealTime test. Clinical sensitivity of RealTime was evaluated in comparison to hc2 on 95 and 267 archived routine cervical specimens collected from women with histologically confirmed cervical carcinoma and CIN3 lesions, respectively. Archived specimens were selected for the present study after linkage with the Slovenian national registry of CIN3 and cervical cancer to obtain histology data.
RESULTS: Concordant results between RealTime and hc2 were obtained in 90/95 cervical cancer samples (94.7% agreement) and in 250/267 CIN3 samples (93.6% agreement). Clinical sensitivity of RealTime and hc2 for cervical cancer in the total study cohort was 88.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 80.3-93.6%) and 87.3% (95% CI: 79.0-92.8%), respectively, and analytical sensitivity for samples containing at least one targeted hr-HPV was 98.8% (95% CI: 93.0-100.0%) and 95.3% (95% CI: 88.2-98.5%), respectively. Clinical sensitivity of RealTime and hc2 for CIN3 lesions of the total study cohort was 91.8% (95% CI: 87.8-94.5%) and 89.1% (95% CI: 84.8-92.3%), respectively, and analytical sensitivity for samples containing at least one targeted hr-HPV was 96.4% (95% CI: 93.3-98.2%) and 92.5% (95% CI: 88.5-95.2%), respectively.
CONCLUSION: The RealTime test showed excellent analytical specificity and no cross-reactivity with low risk HPV genotypes that tested positive with hc2. Clinical sensitivity of the RealTime assay using archived routine cervical specimens was comparable to hc2. The RealTime test is an important new method applicable to cervical carcinoma screening and management of cervical precancerous lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19784522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat        ISSN: 1318-4458


  15 in total

Review 1.  Human Papillomavirus Laboratory Testing: the Changing Paradigm.

Authors:  Eileen M Burd
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Comparison of seven tests for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with abnormal smears: the Predictors 2 study.

Authors:  Anne Szarewski; David Mesher; Louise Cadman; Janet Austin; Lesley Ashdown-Barr; Linda Ho; George Terry; Stuart Liddle; Martin Young; Mark Stoler; Julie McCarthy; Corrina Wright; Christine Bergeron; W P Soutter; Deirdre Lyons; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of clinical performance of Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test with that of hybrid capture 2 assay in a screening setting.

Authors:  F M Carozzi; E Burroni; S Bisanzi; D Puliti; M Confortini; P Giorgi Rossi; C Sani; A Scalisi; F Chini
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of clinical and analytical performance of the Abbott Realtime High Risk HPV test to the performance of hybrid capture 2 in population-based cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Mario Poljak; Anja Ostrbenk; Katja Seme; Veronika Ucakar; Peter Hillemanns; Eda Vrtacnik Bokal; Nina Jancar; Irena Klavs
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Performance of a New HPV Cervi-Collect Collection and Transportation Kit.

Authors:  M Chernesky; S Huang; D Jang; B Erickson; J Salituro; H Engel; J Gilchrist; P Neuscheler; W B Mak; K Abravaya
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 6.  Is 58% sensitivity for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 and invasive cervical cancer optimal for cervical screening?

Authors:  R Marshall Austin; Chengquan Zhao
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.091

7.  From Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Detection to Cervical Cancer Prevention in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Sin Hang Lee; Jessica S Vigliotti; Veronica S Vigliotti; William Jones
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Limitations of widely used high-risk human papillomavirus laboratory-developed testing in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Keith V Nance
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2013-01-21

9.  Comparison of the AdvanSure human papillomavirus screening real-time PCR, the Abbott RealTime High Risk human papillomavirus test, and the Hybrid Capture human papillomavirus DNA test for the detection of human papillomavirus.

Authors:  Yusun Hwang; Miae Lee
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.464

10.  Application of multiplex PCR for Rapid and sensitive detection of human papillomaviruses in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Fateme Zandnia; Abbas Doosti; Abbas Mokhtari-Farsani; Mohammad Taghi Kardi; Abolfazl Movafagh
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.