MOTIVATION: For the early detection of cancer, highly sensitive and specific biomarkers are needed. Particularly, biomarkers in bio-fluids are relatively more useful because those can be used for non-biopsy tests. Although the altered metabolic activities of cancer cells have been observed in many studies, little is known about metabolic biomarkers for cancer screening. In this study, a systematic method is proposed for identifying metabolic biomarkers in urine samples by selecting candidate biomarkers from altered genome-wide gene expression signatures of cancer cells. Biomarkers identified by the present study have increased coherence and robustness because the significances of biomarkers are validated in both gene expression profiles and metabolic profiles. RESULTS: The proposed method was applied to the gene expression profiles and urine samples of 50 breast cancer patients and 50 normal persons. Nine altered metabolic pathways were identified from the breast cancer gene expression signatures. Among these altered metabolic pathways, four metabolic biomarkers (Homovanillate, 4-hydroxyphenylacetate, 5-hydroxyindoleacetate and urea) were identified to be different in cancer and normal subjects (p <0.05). In the case of the predictive performance, the identified biomarkers achieved area under the ROC curve values of 0.75, 0.79 and 0.79, according to a linear discriminate analysis, a random forest classifier and on a support vector machine, respectively. Finally, biomarkers which showed consistent significance in pathways' gene expression as well as urine samples were identified. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: For the early detection of cancer, highly sensitive and specific biomarkers are needed. Particularly, biomarkers in bio-fluids are relatively more useful because those can be used for non-biopsy tests. Although the altered metabolic activities of cancer cells have been observed in many studies, little is known about metabolic biomarkers for cancer screening. In this study, a systematic method is proposed for identifying metabolic biomarkers in urine samples by selecting candidate biomarkers from altered genome-wide gene expression signatures of cancer cells. Biomarkers identified by the present study have increased coherence and robustness because the significances of biomarkers are validated in both gene expression profiles and metabolic profiles. RESULTS: The proposed method was applied to the gene expression profiles and urine samples of 50 breast cancerpatients and 50 normal persons. Nine altered metabolic pathways were identified from the breast cancer gene expression signatures. Among these altered metabolic pathways, four metabolic biomarkers (Homovanillate, 4-hydroxyphenylacetate, 5-hydroxyindoleacetate and urea) were identified to be different in cancer and normal subjects (p <0.05). In the case of the predictive performance, the identified biomarkers achieved area under the ROC curve values of 0.75, 0.79 and 0.79, according to a linear discriminate analysis, a random forest classifier and on a support vector machine, respectively. Finally, biomarkers which showed consistent significance in pathways' gene expression as well as urine samples were identified. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Franca Podo; Lutgarde M C Buydens; Hadassa Degani; Riet Hilhorst; Edda Klipp; Ingrid S Gribbestad; Sabine Van Huffel; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Jan Luts; Daniel Monleon; Geert J Postma; Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra; Filippo Santoro; Hans Wouters; Hege G Russnes; Therese Sørlie; Elda Tagliabue; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2010-04-24 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: David B Liesenfeld; Nina Habermann; Robert W Owen; Augustin Scalbert; Cornelia M Ulrich Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Chen Dai; Verodia Charlestin; Man Wang; Zachary T Walker; Maria Cristina Miranda-Vergara; Beth A Facchine; Junmin Wu; William J Kaliney; Norman J Dovichi; Jun Li; Laurie E Littlepage Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Theodore R Sana; Steve Fischer; Gert Wohlgemuth; Anjali Katrekar; Ki-Hong Jung; Pam C Ronald; Oliver Fiehn Journal: Metabolomics Date: 2010-05-27 Impact factor: 4.290
Authors: Fei Li; Andrew D Patterson; Kristopher W Krausz; Changtao Jiang; Huichang Bi; Anastasia L Sowers; John A Cook; James B Mitchell; Frank J Gonzalez Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Carsten Denkert; Elmar Bucher; Mika Hilvo; Reza Salek; Matej Orešič; Julian Griffin; Scarlet Brockmöller; Frederick Klauschen; Sibylle Loibl; Dinesh Kumar Barupal; Jan Budczies; Kristiina Iljin; Valentina Nekljudova; Oliver Fiehn Journal: Genome Med Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 11.117