Literature DB >> 1978363

The conditioning connection.

I P McLaren1, A Dickinson.   

Abstract

In 1948 Konorski argued that conditioning reflects the strengthening of a connection between elements representing the signal and the reinforcer, as a result of the coincidence of activity in the signal element with a rise in activity in the reinforcer element. This Konorskian process represents one way of implementing an error-correcting learning rule and thus, unlike a simple Hebbian process, anticipates selective conditioning, such as that observed in Kamin's blocking procedure. However, the Konorskian process, in common with other error-correcting learning rules, fails to explain why blocking is attenuated by 'surprising' changes in reinforcement conditions that should not augment activity in the reinforcer element. Rather, the reinforcer-specificity of such unblocking suggests the operation of an associability process by which stored information about the past predictive history of the signal is expressed at the connection between signal and reinforcer elements to modulate changes in the connection weight.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1978363     DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1990.0163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  9 in total

Review 1.  Toward a neurobiology of delusions.

Authors:  P R Corlett; J R Taylor; X-J Wang; P C Fletcher; J H Krystal
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 11.685

2.  An attention-modulated associative network.

Authors:  Justin A Harris; Evan J Livesey
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Elemental representation and configural mappings: combining elemental and configural theories of associative learning.

Authors:  I P L McLaren; C L Forrest; R P McLaren
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Normalization between stimulus elements in a model of Pavlovian conditioning: showjumping on an elemental horse.

Authors:  Anna Thorwart; Evan J Livesey; Justin A Harris
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 5.  Explaining Delusions: Reducing Uncertainty Through Basic and Computational Neuroscience.

Authors:  Erin J Feeney; Stephanie M Groman; Jane R Taylor; Philip R Corlett
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  What we think about when we think about predictive processing.

Authors:  Philip R Corlett; Aprajita Mohanty; Angus W MacDonald
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2020-08

7.  Lesions in the anterior thalamic nuclei of rats do not disrupt acquisition of stimulus sequence learning.

Authors:  John P Aggleton; Eman Amin; Trisha A Jenkins; John M Pearce; Jasper Robinson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Relative recency influences object-in-context memory.

Authors:  Shu K E Tam; Charlotte Bonardi; Jasper Robinson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Why do delusions persist?

Authors:  Philip R Corlett; John H Krystal; Jane R Taylor; Paul C Fletcher
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.