Literature DB >> 19783591

Microarchitecture, the key to bone quality.

Maria Luisa Brandi1.   

Abstract

Bone has the ability to adapt its shape and size in response to mechanical loads via a process known as modelling in which bones are shaped or reshaped by the independent action of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Remodelling is a process that maintains mechanical integrity of the skeleton, allowing it to selectively repair and replace damaged bone. During adulthood, bone remodelling is the dominant process; after the age of 40 years, the age-related decline in bone mass increases the risk of fracture, especially in women. Osteoporosis is defined as a reduction in bone mass and an impairment of bone architecture resulting in thinning and increased cortical porosity, bone fragility and fracture risk. As new products and methods have been developed, focusing on bone fragility, effective and sensitive non-invasive means able to detect early changes in bone fragility process have also been developed. Due to limitations in assessing fracture risk and response to therapy, the evaluation of bone mineral contents by bone densitometry is progressively replaced by new non-invasive and/or non-destructive techniques able to estimate bone strength, providing structural information about the pathophysiology of bone fragility by quantitative assessments of macro- and microstructural bone features. DXA and volumetric QCT quantify bone macrostructure, whereas high-resolution CT, microCT, high-resolution MR and microMR assess bone microstructure. Knowledge of bone microarchitecture is a clue for understanding osteoporosis pathophysiology and improving its diagnosis and treatment; the response of microarchitecture parameters to treatment should allow assessment of the real efficacy of the osteoporosis therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19783591     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  56 in total

Review 1.  Type 2 diabetes and bone fractures.

Authors:  Kendall F Moseley
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 2.  Microarchitecture in focus.

Authors:  R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  An Improved Immunostaining and Imaging Methodology to Determine Cell and Protein Distributions within the Bone Environment.

Authors:  Hemanth Akkiraju; Jeremy Bonor; Anja Nohe
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  Short-term precision assessment of trabecular bone score and bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with different scan modes: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Michele Bandirali; Alessandro Poloni; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Carmelo Messina; Giacomo Davide Edoardo Papini; Marcello Petrini; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Finite Element-Based Mechanical Assessment of Bone Quality on the Basis of In Vivo Images.

Authors:  Dieter H Pahr; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Microstructural characterization of trabecular bone using ultrasonic backscattering and diffusion parameters.

Authors:  Hualong Du; Kaustav Mohanty; Marie Muller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The Effect of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Application on Distracted Bone Quality during Rapid Rate of Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Marwa El Kassaby; Khaled Abd El Kader; Nahed Khamis; Alaa Al Hammoud; Alaa Ben Talb; Yasser Nabil El Hadidi
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-07-19

8.  Noninvasive Raman spectroscopy of rat tibiae: approach to in vivo assessment of bone quality.

Authors:  Paul I Okagbare; Dana Begun; Mary Tecklenburg; Ayorinde Awonusi; Steven A Goldstein; Michael D Morris
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Reproducibility of trabecular bone score with different scan modes using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a phantom study.

Authors:  Michele Bandirali; Giovanni Di Leo; Carmelo Messina; Maria Juana Pastor Lopez; Alessandro Mai; Fabio M Ulivieri; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  High-normal free thyroxine levels are associated with low trabecular bone scores in euthyroid postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Y Hwangbo; J H Kim; S W Kim; Y J Park; D J Park; S Y Kim; C S Shin; N H Cho
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.