Literature DB >> 19783361

Differential inhibition sensitivities of MET mutants to the small molecule inhibitor SU11274.

Yitzhak Zimmer1, Angelina V Vaseva, Michaela Medová, Bruno Streit, Wieslawa Blank-Liss, Richard H Greiner, Nikolaus Schiering, Daniel M Aebersold.   

Abstract

Point mutations emerge as one of the rate-limiting steps in tumor response to small molecule inhibitors of protein kinases. Here we characterized the response of the MET mutated variants, V1110I, V1238I, V1206L and H1112L to the small molecule SU11274. Our results reveal a distinct inhibition pattern of the four mutations with IC(50) values for autophosphorylation inhibition ranging between 0.15 and 1.5muM. Differences were further seen on the ability of SU11274 to inhibit phosphorylation of downstream MET transducers such as AKT, ERK, PLCgamma and STAT3 and a variety of MET-dependent biological endpoints. In all the assays, H1112L was the most sensitive to SU11274, while V1206L was less affected under the used concentration range. The differences in responses to SU11274 are discussed based on a structural model of the MET kinase domain. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19783361     DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Lett        ISSN: 0304-3835            Impact factor:   8.679


  8 in total

1.  KRAS and HRAS mutations confer resistance to MET targeting in preclinical models of MET-expressing tumor cells.

Authors:  Dominic Leiser; Michaela Medová; Kei Mikami; Lluís Nisa; Deborah Stroka; Andree Blaukat; Friedhelm Bladt; Daniel M Aebersold; Yitzhak Zimmer
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  NPS-1034, a novel MET inhibitor, inhibits the activated MET receptor and its constitutively active mutants.

Authors:  Jae-Sik Shin; Seung-Woo Hong; Jai-Hee Moon; Jin-Sun Kim; Kyung-Ah Jung; Seung-Mi Kim; Dae-Hee Lee; InKi Kim; Seon-Joo Yoon; Chang-Gyu Lee; Eun-Kyoung Choi; Joo-Young Lee; Kyu-Pyo Kim; Yong Sang Hong; Jae-Lyun Lee; Bongcheol Kim; Eun Kyung Choi; Jung Shin Lee; Dong-Hoon Jin; Tae Won Kim
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Response to crizotinib in a patient with MET-mutant papillary renal cell cancer after progression on tivantinib.

Authors:  Mark N Stein; Kim M Hirshfield; Hua Zhong; Eric A Singer; Siraj M Ali; Shridar Ganesan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  MET in human cancer: germline and somatic mutations.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Tovar; Carrie R Graveel
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-05

5.  MET Inhibition Results in DNA Breaks and Synergistically Sensitizes Tumor Cells to DNA-Damaging Agents Potentially by Breaching a Damage-Induced Checkpoint Arrest.

Authors:  Michaela Medová; Daniel Matthias Aebersold; Wieslawa Blank-Liss; Bruno Streit; Matúš Medo; Stefan Aebi; Yitzhak Zimmer
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2010-10

6.  D1398G Variant of MET Is Associated with Impaired Signaling of Hepatocyte Growth Factor in Alveolar Epithelial Cells and Lung Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Ilia Atanelishvili; Yuichiro Shirai; Tanjina Akter; Atsushi Noguchi; Kurt T Ash; Suniti Misra; Sibnath Ghatak; Richard M Silver; Galina S Bogatkevich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  PIK3CA hotspot mutations differentially impact responses to MET targeting in MET-driven and non-driven preclinical cancer models.

Authors:  Lluís Nisa; Pascal Häfliger; Michaela Poliaková; Roland Giger; Paola Francica; Daniel Matthias Aebersold; Roch-Philippe Charles; Yitzhak Zimmer; Michaela Medová
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 27.401

8.  The Blocking of c-Met Signaling Induces Apoptosis through the Increase of p53 Protein in Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Hae-Yun Jung; Hyun-Jung Joo; Jong Kuk Park; Yeul Hong Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 4.679

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.