Literature DB >> 19783175

Costs and reimbursement gaps after implementation of third-generation left ventricular assist devices.

Vinod Mishra1, Odd Geiran, Arnt E Fiane, Gro Sørensen, Sølvi Andresen, Ellen K Olsen, Ishtiaq Khushi, Terje P Hagen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast total hospital costs and subsequent reimbursement of implementing a new program using a third-generation left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in Norway.
METHODS: Between July 2005 and March 2008, the total costs of treatment for 9 patients were examined. Costs were calculated for three periods-the pre-implantation LVAD phase, the LVAD implantation phase and the post-implantation LVAD phase-as well as for total hospital care. Patient-specific costs were obtained prospectively from patient records and included personnel resources, medication, blood products, blood chemistry and microbiology, imaging, and procedure costs including operating room costs. Overhead costs were registered retrospectively and allocated to the specific patient by pre-defined allocation keys. Finally, patient-specific costs and overhead costs were aggregated into total patient costs.
RESULTS: The average total patient cost in 2007 U.S. dollars was $735,342 and the median was $613,087 (range $342,581 to $1,256,026). The mean length of stay was 77 days (range 40 to 127 days). For the LVAD implantation phase, the mean cost was $457,795 and median cost was $458,611 (range $246,239 to $677,680). The mean length of stay for the LVAD implantation phase was 55 days (range 25 to 125 days). The diagnosis-related group (DRG) reimbursement (2007) was $143,192.
CONCLUSIONS: There is significant discrepancy between actual hospital costs and the current Norwegian DRG reimbursement for the LVAD procedure. This discrepancy can be partly explained by excessive costs related to the introduction of a new program with new technology. Costly innovations should be considered in price setting of reimbursement for novel technology. Copyright (c) 2010 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19783175     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.06.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  4 in total

1.  In-hospital cost comparison between percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation and surgery.

Authors:  Brith Andresen; Vinod Mishra; Milena Lewandowska; Jack Gunnar Andersen; Marit Helen Andersen; Harald Lindberg; Gaute Døhlen; Erik Fosse
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Hospital costs fell as numbers of LVADs were increasing: experiences from Oslo University Hospital.

Authors:  Vinod Mishra; Arnt E Fiane; Odd Geiran; Gro Sørensen; Ishtiaq Khushi; Terje P Hagen
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 3.  Mechanical Ventricular Assistance as Destination Therapy for End-Stage Heart Failure: Has it Become a First Line Therapy?

Authors:  Massimo Bonacchi; Guy Harmelin; Marco Bugetti; Guido Sani
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-08-03

4.  Oncologists' and family physicians' views on value for money of cancer and congestive heart failure care.

Authors:  Dan Greenberg; Ariel Hammerman; Shlomo Vinker; Adi Shani; Yuval Yermiahu; Peter J Neumann
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2013-11-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.