BACKGROUND: Smooth pursuit deficits are an intermediate phenotype for schizophrenia that may result from disturbances in visual motion perception, sensorimotor transformation, predictive mechanisms, or alterations in basic oculomotor control. Which of these components are the primary causes of smooth pursuit impairments and whether they are impaired similarly across psychotic disorders remain to be established. METHODS: First-episode psychotic patients with bipolar disorder (n = 34), unipolar depression (n = 24), or schizophrenia (n = 77) and matched healthy participants (n = 130) performed three smooth pursuit tasks designed to evaluate different components of pursuit tracking. RESULTS: On ramp tasks, maintenance pursuit velocity was reduced in all three patients groups with psychotic bipolar patients exhibiting the most severe impairments. Open loop pursuit velocity was reduced in psychotic bipolar and schizophrenia patients. Motion perception during pursuit initiation, as indicated by the accuracy of saccades to moving targets, was not impaired in any patient group. Analyses in 138 participants followed for 6 weeks, during which patients were treated and psychotic symptom severity decreased, and no significant change in performance in any group was revealed. CONCLUSIONS: Sensorimotor transformation deficits in all patient groups suggest a common alteration in frontostriatal networks that dynamically regulate gain control of pursuit responses using sensory input and feedback about performance. Predictive mechanisms appear to be sufficiently intact to compensate for this deficit across psychotic disorders. The absence of significant changes after acute treatment and symptom reduction suggests that these deficits appear to be stable over time. Copyright 2010 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Smooth pursuit deficits are an intermediate phenotype for schizophrenia that may result from disturbances in visual motion perception, sensorimotor transformation, predictive mechanisms, or alterations in basic oculomotor control. Which of these components are the primary causes of smooth pursuit impairments and whether they are impaired similarly across psychotic disorders remain to be established. METHODS: First-episode psychoticpatients with bipolar disorder (n = 34), unipolar depression (n = 24), or schizophrenia (n = 77) and matched healthy participants (n = 130) performed three smooth pursuit tasks designed to evaluate different components of pursuit tracking. RESULTS: On ramp tasks, maintenance pursuit velocity was reduced in all three patients groups with psychotic bipolarpatients exhibiting the most severe impairments. Open loop pursuit velocity was reduced in psychotic bipolar and schizophreniapatients. Motion perception during pursuit initiation, as indicated by the accuracy of saccades to moving targets, was not impaired in any patient group. Analyses in 138 participants followed for 6 weeks, during which patients were treated and psychotic symptom severity decreased, and no significant change in performance in any group was revealed. CONCLUSIONS:Sensorimotor transformation deficits in all patient groups suggest a common alteration in frontostriatal networks that dynamically regulate gain control of pursuit responses using sensory input and feedback about performance. Predictive mechanisms appear to be sufficiently intact to compensate for this deficit across psychotic disorders. The absence of significant changes after acute treatment and symptom reduction suggests that these deficits appear to be stable over time. Copyright 2010 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: J A Sweeney; B Luna; N M Srinivasagam; M S Keshavan; N R Schooler; G L Haas; J R Carl Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 1998-10-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Rebekka Lencer; Jeffrey R Bishop; Margret S H Harris; James L Reilly; Shitalben Patel; Rick Kittles; Konasale M Prasad; Vishwajit L Nimgaonkar; Matcheri S Keshavan; John A Sweeney Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Matthew W Mosconi; Margaret Kay; Anna-Maria D'Cruz; Stephen Guter; Kush Kapur; Carol Macmillan; Lisa D Stanford; John A Sweeney Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-08
Authors: Rebekka Lencer; Andreas Sprenger; James L Reilly; Jennifer E McDowell; Leah H Rubin; Judith A Badner; Matcheri S Keshavan; Godfrey D Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; Elliot S Gershon; Brett A Clementz; John A Sweeney Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Sarah K Keedy; Jeffrey R Bishop; Peter J Weiden; John A Sweeney; Cherise Rosen; Robert Marvin; James L Reilly Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2014-08-08 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Rebekka Lencer; Sarah K Keedy; James L Reilly; Bruce E McDonough; Margret S H Harris; Andreas Sprenger; John A Sweeney Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2011-08-27 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Elena I Ivleva; Amanda F Moates; Jordan P Hamm; Ira H Bernstein; Hugh B O'Neill; Darwynn Cole; Brett A Clementz; Gunvant K Thaker; Carol A Tamminga Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Rachel A McKinney; Suzanne N Avery; Kristan Armstrong; Jennifer Urbano Blackford; Neil D Woodward; Stephan Heckers Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2020-10-11 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Matthew E Hudgens-Haney; Brett A Clementz; Elena I Ivleva; Matcheri S Keshavan; Godfrey D Pearlson; Elliot S Gershon; Sarah K Keedy; John A Sweeney; Florence Gaudoux; Pierre Bunouf; Benoit Canolle; Françoise Tonner; Silvia Gatti-McArthur; Carol A Tamminga Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 9.306