Literature DB >> 19782649

NBS1 cooperates with homologous recombination to counteract chromosome breakage during replication.

Linda Brugmans1, Nicole S Verkaik, Maurice Kunen, Ellen van Drunen, Bret R Williams, John H J Petrini, Roland Kanaar, Jeroen Essers, Dik C van Gent.   

Abstract

Nijmegen breakage syndrome (NBS) is characterized by genome instability and cancer predisposition. NBS patients contain a mutation in the NBS1 gene, which encodes the NBS1 component of the DNA double-strand break (DSB) response complex MRE11/RAD50/NBS1. To investigate the NBS phenotype in more detail, we combined the mouse mimic of the most common patient mutation (Nbs1(Delta B/DeltaB)) with a Rad54 null mutation, which diminishes homologous recombination. Double mutant cells were particularly sensitive to treatments that cause single strand breaks (SSBs), presumably because these SSBs can be converted into detrimental DSBs upon passage of a replication fork. The persistent presence of nuclear RAD51 foci and increased levels of chromatid type breaks in metaphase spreads indicated that replication-associated DSBs are repaired inefficiently in the double mutant cells. We conclude that Nbs1 and Rad54 function cooperatively, but in separate pathways to counteract this type of DNA damage and discuss mechanistic implications of these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19782649      PMCID: PMC2995292          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  36 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-stranded break connection.

Authors:  D C van Gent; J H Hoeijmakers; R Kanaar
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  The Mre11 complex: at the crossroads of dna repair and checkpoint signalling.

Authors:  Damien D'Amours; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 3.  Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer.

Authors:  J H Hoeijmakers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-17       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Analysis of mouse Rad54 expression and its implications for homologous recombination.

Authors:  Jeroen Essers; Rudi W Hendriks; Joanna Wesoly; Cecile E M T Beerens; Bep Smit; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Claire Wyman; Mies L G Dronkert; Roland Kanaar
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2002-10-01

5.  The Rad50 zinc-hook is a structure joining Mre11 complexes in DNA recombination and repair.

Authors:  Karl-Peter Hopfner; Lisa Craig; Gabriel Moncalian; Robert A Zinkel; Takehiko Usui; Barbara A L Owen; Annette Karcher; Brendan Henderson; Jean-Luc Bodmer; Cynthia T McMurray; James P Carney; John H J Petrini; John A Tainer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Checking on DNA damage in S phase.

Authors:  Jiri Bartek; Claudia Lukas; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 94.444

7.  Human Rad50/Mre11 is a flexible complex that can tether DNA ends.

Authors:  M de Jager; J van Noort; D C van Gent; C Dekker; R Kanaar; C Wyman
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Mouse RAD54 affects DNA double-strand break repair and sister chromatid exchange.

Authors:  M L Dronkert; H B Beverloo; R D Johnson; J H Hoeijmakers; M Jasin; R Kanaar
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  A murine model of Nijmegen breakage syndrome.

Authors:  Bret R Williams; Olga K Mirzoeva; William F Morgan; Junyu Lin; Wesley Dunnick; John H J Petrini
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Chk2 activation dependence on Nbs1 after DNA damage.

Authors:  G Buscemi; C Savio; L Zannini; F Miccichè; D Masnada; M Nakanishi; H Tauchi; K Komatsu; S Mizutani; K Khanna; P Chen; P Concannon; L Chessa; D Delia
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  5 in total

1.  Distinct cellular phenotype linked to defective DNA interstrand crosslink repair and homologous recombination.

Authors:  Aleksandra M Gorniewska; Katarzyna Kluzek; Lidia Gackowska; Izabela Kubiszewska; Malgorzata Z Zdzienicka; Aneta Bialkowska
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.952

2.  EXO1 is critical for embryogenesis and the DNA damage response in mice with a hypomorphic Nbs1 allele.

Authors:  Katrin Rein; Diana A Yanez; Berta Terré; Lluís Palenzuela; Suvi Aivio; Kaichun Wei; Winfried Edelmann; Jeremy M Stark; Travis H Stracker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  The Role of DNA Repair in Immunological Diversity: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Ramifications.

Authors:  Peter Gullickson; Yunwen W Xu; Laura J Niedernhofer; Elizabeth L Thompson; Matthew J Yousefzadeh
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 8.786

4.  BRCA2 diffuses as oligomeric clusters with RAD51 and changes mobility after DNA damage in live cells.

Authors:  Marcel Reuter; Alex Zelensky; Ihor Smal; Erik Meijering; Wiggert A van Cappellen; H Martijn de Gruiter; Gijsbert J van Belle; Martin E van Royen; Adriaan B Houtsmuller; Jeroen Essers; Roland Kanaar; Claire Wyman
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 10.539

5.  CDK targeting of NBS1 promotes DNA-end resection, replication restart and homologous recombination.

Authors:  Jacob Falck; Josep V Forment; Julia Coates; Martin Mistrik; Jiri Lukas; Jiri Bartek; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 8.807

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.