Literature DB >> 19782586

Pre-operative prediction of post-VAD implant mortality using easily accessible clinical parameters.

Stefan Klotz1, Christian Vahlhaus, Christian Riehl, Christiane Reitz, Juergen R Sindermann, Hans H Scheld.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mortality rates are high after implantation of a ventricular assist device (VAD), occurring mainly in the early phase post-implant during the time in the intensive care unit (ICU). Pre-operative selection criteria, which predict successful outcome, are difficult to evaluate. We implemented a pre-operative risk score to predict mortality in the ICU after VAD implantation by using easily obtained and quickly accessible clinical parameters.
METHODS: In 241 VAD patients, 100 pre-operative markers were related to mortality in the ICU using univariate analysis and ROC curves, followed by multinomial logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: The mortality rate in the ICU was 32.0%. Univariate statistical analysis revealed 34 parameters that were significantly associated with mortality in the ICU. Of these, multinomial logistic regression identified 13 markers as significant risk factors. These included demographic data (age >50 years); clinically/procedurally relevant data (ischemic cardiomyopathy [ICM], re-do surgery, on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO], on intra-aortic balloon pump [IABP], previous cardiac surgery, ventilation, emergency implant, inotropic support, renal replacement therapy, pre-operative resuscitation, transfusion) and laboratory values (blood urea nitrogen [BUN] >40 mg/dl, creatinine >1.5 mg/dl, lactate >3 mg/dl, platelets <100 x 10(3)/microl, white blood cell [WBC] count >13 x 10(3)/microl, C-reactive protein [CRP] >8 mg/dl, hemoglobin <12 g/dl, hematocrit <35%, lactate dehydrogenase [LDH] >500 U/liter, creatine kinase [CK] >200 U/liter, troponin >20 ng/ml). A weighted risk score was implemented with a maximum of 50 points. The risk for mortality in the ICU was as follows: low (15.8%), <15 points; medium (48.2%), 16 to 30 points; and high (65.2%), >30 points.
CONCLUSIONS: Easily obtained and quickly accessible clinical parameters can inform potential patients, relatives, and physicians pre-operatively about the risk of death in the ICU after VAD implantation. Copyright (c) 2010 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19782586     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  10 in total

1.  A Classification Approach for Risk Prognosis of Patients on Mechanical Ventricular Assistance.

Authors:  Yajuan Wang; Carolyn Penstein Rosé; Antonio Ferreira; Dennis M McNamara; Robert L Kormos; James F Antaki
Journal:  Proc Int Conf Mach Learn Appl       Date:  2010-12-12

Review 2.  [Noncardiological surgical procedure for patients implanted with a ventricular assist device. Anesthesiological management concepts].

Authors:  F E Blum
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 0.840

3.  Temporal leukocyte numbers and granulocyte activation in pulsatile and rotary ventricular assist device patients.

Authors:  Joshua R Woolley; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Christian A Bermudez; Jay K Bhama; Kathleen L Lockard; Robert L Kormos; William R Wagner
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.094

4.  Relation of preoperative serum albumin levels to survival in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Tomoko S Kato; Shuichi Kitada; Jonathan Yang; Christina Wu; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; Maryjane Farr; Donna M Mancini; P Christian Schulze
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Baseline red blood cell osmotic fragility does not predict the degree of post-LVAD hemolysis.

Authors:  Jesse L Madden; Stavros G Drakos; Josef Stehlik; Stephen H McKellar; Matthew T Rondina; Andrew S Weyrich; Craig H Selzman
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  Ventricular assist device implant in the elderly is associated with increased, but respectable risk: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Pavan Atluri; Andrew B Goldstone; Dale M Kobrin; Jeffrey E Cohen; John W MacArthur; Jessica L Howard; Mariell L Jessup; J Eduardo Rame; Michael A Acker; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Long-term clinical results of acute myocardial infarction at the left main trunk requiring percutaneous cardiopulmonary support.

Authors:  Takashi Yamauchi; Takafumi Masai; Kenji Fujii; Yoshiki Sawa; Shinya Shirai; Mitsunori Kamigaki; Naofumi Itou
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 1.731

8.  Short-term ventricular assist device in post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock: factors influencing survival.

Authors:  Prashant N Mohite; Anton Sabashnikov; Nikhil P Patil; Diana García Sáez; Bartlomiej Zych; Aron F Popov; Alexander Weymann; Thorsten Wahlers; Nandor Marczin; Fabio DeRobertis; Toufan Bahrami; Mohamed Amrani; André R Simon
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 1.731

9.  Experience with the SynCardia total artificial heart in a Canadian centre.

Authors:  Anthony Nguyen; Michel Pellerin; Louis P Perrault; Michel White; Anique Ducharme; Normand Racine; Michel Carrier
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Serum Brain Natriuretic Peptide Concentration 60 Days After Surgery as a Predictor of Long-Term Prognosis in Patients Implanted With a Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Takuma Sato; Osamu Seguchi; Yoshio Iwashima; Masanobu Yanase; Seiko Nakajima; Michinari Hieda; Takuya Watanabe; Haruki Sunami; Yoshihiro Murata; Hiroki Hata; Tomoyuki Fujita; Junjiro Kobayashi; Takeshi Nakatani
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.872

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.