Literature DB >> 19782390

Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.

Jaana Simola1, Kenneth Holmqvist, Magnus Lindgren.   

Abstract

Readers acquire information outside the current eye fixation. Previous research indicates that having only the fixated word available slows reading, but when the next word is visible, reading is almost as fast as when the whole line is seen. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects are interpreted to reflect that the characteristics of a parafoveal word can influence fixation on a current word. Prior studies also show that words presented to the right visual field (RVF) are processed faster and more accurately than words in the left visual field (LVF). This asymmetry results either from an attentional bias, reading direction, or the cerebral asymmetry of language processing. We used eye-fixation-related potentials (EFRP), a technique that combines eye-tracking and electroencephalography, to investigate visual field differences in parafoveal-on-foveal effects. After a central fixation, a prime word appeared in the middle of the screen together with a parafoveal target that was presented either to the LVF or to the RVF. Both hemifield presentations included three semantic conditions: the words were either semantically associated, non-associated, or the target was a non-word. The participants began reading from the prime and then made a saccade towards the target, subsequently they judged the semantic association. Between 200 and 280ms from the fixation onset, an occipital P2 EFRP-component differentiated between parafoveal word and non-word stimuli when the parafoveal word appeared in the RVF. The results suggest that the extraction of parafoveal information is affected by attention, which is oriented as a function of reading direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19782390     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  23 in total

1.  Trans-saccadic repetition priming: ERPs reveal on-line integration of information across words.

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Parafoveal perception during sentence reading? An ERP paradigm using rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) with flankers.

Authors:  Horacio A Barber; Shir Ben-Zvi; Shlomo Bentin; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Parafoveal N400 effect during sentence reading.

Authors:  Horacio A Barber; Nuria Doñamayor; Marta Kutas; Thomas Münte
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  An electrophysiological analysis of contextual and temporal constraints on parafoveal word processing.

Authors:  Horacio A Barber; Maartje van der Meij; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Target probability modulates fixation-related potentials in visual search.

Authors:  Hannah Hiebel; Anja Ischebeck; Clemens Brunner; Andrey R Nikolaev; Margit Höfler; Christof Körner
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  Event-related brain potentials reveal age-related changes in parafoveal-foveal integration during sentence processing.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Co-registration of eye movements and event-related potentials in connected-text paragraph reading.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Steven G Luke; Joseph Schmidt; John E Richards
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-10

8.  Evaluating effects of divided hemispheric processing on word recognition in foveal and extrafoveal displays: the evidence from Arabic.

Authors:  Abubaker A A Almabruk; Kevin B Paterson; Victoria McGowan; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Subjective impressions do not mirror online reading effort: concurrent EEG-eyetracking evidence from the reading of books and digital media.

Authors:  Franziska Kretzschmar; Dominique Pleimling; Jana Hosemann; Stephan Füssel; Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky; Matthias Schlesewsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A new high-speed visual stimulation method for gaze-contingent eye movement and brain activity studies.

Authors:  Fabio Richlan; Benjamin Gagl; Sarah Schuster; Stefan Hawelka; Josef Humenberger; Florian Hutzler
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.