BACKGROUND: In assessing neurologic prognosis after cardiac arrest (CA), electroencephalogram (EEG) reactivity has not been specifically included with EEG classifications. Most studies have divided recordings into benign and malignant; however, some patterns within these groups may have greater prognostic significance than such broad classifications. We sought to explore reactivity, with broad classifications and subclassifications for their prognostic significance. METHODS: All consecutive adults in coma who had an EEG recording performed at least 1 day after CA or during normothermia after a 24-hour mild hypothermia protocol. Outcomes were dichotomous: recovery of awareness or no recovery of awareness during hospitalization. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. Of the 18 patients with no reactivity, only 1 recovered awareness; of the 11 patients who demonstrated reactivity, 10 recovered awareness (sensitivity of 90% [95% confidence interval, or CI, 0.57-1] and specificity of 94% [95% CI, 0.7-1]). Of those with benign patterns, 7 recovered awareness and 1 did not; however, those patients demonstrating malignant patterns, 4 recovered and 17 did not (sensitivity of 94% [95% CI, 0.7-1] and a specificity of 63% [95% CI, 0.32-0.88]). None of the 15 patients with suppression or generalized spikes recovered consciousness, and none of these patients demonstrated reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: Electroencephalogram reactivity after CA is a relatively favorable EEG feature; generalized suppression or generalized epileptiform activity, without reactivity, is associated with lack of recovery of awareness. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: In assessing neurologic prognosis after cardiac arrest (CA), electroencephalogram (EEG) reactivity has not been specifically included with EEG classifications. Most studies have divided recordings into benign and malignant; however, some patterns within these groups may have greater prognostic significance than such broad classifications. We sought to explore reactivity, with broad classifications and subclassifications for their prognostic significance. METHODS: All consecutive adults in coma who had an EEG recording performed at least 1 day after CA or during normothermia after a 24-hour mild hypothermia protocol. Outcomes were dichotomous: recovery of awareness or no recovery of awareness during hospitalization. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. Of the 18 patients with no reactivity, only 1 recovered awareness; of the 11 patients who demonstrated reactivity, 10 recovered awareness (sensitivity of 90% [95% confidence interval, or CI, 0.57-1] and specificity of 94% [95% CI, 0.7-1]). Of those with benign patterns, 7 recovered awareness and 1 did not; however, those patients demonstrating malignant patterns, 4 recovered and 17 did not (sensitivity of 94% [95% CI, 0.7-1] and a specificity of 63% [95% CI, 0.32-0.88]). None of the 15 patients with suppression or generalized spikes recovered consciousness, and none of these patients demonstrated reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: Electroencephalogram reactivity after CA is a relatively favorable EEG feature; generalized suppression or generalized epileptiform activity, without reactivity, is associated with lack of recovery of awareness. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Sudha Kilaru Kessler; Alexis A Topjian; Ana M Gutierrez-Colina; Rebecca N Ichord; Maureen Donnelly; Vinay M Nadkarni; Robert A Berg; Dennis J Dlugos; Robert R Clancy; Nicholas S Abend Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Stefan Jonas; Andrea O Rossetti; Mauro Oddo; Simon Jenni; Paolo Favaro; Frederic Zubler Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Nicholas S Abend; Ram Mani; Tammy N Tschuda; Tae Chang; Alexis A Topjian; Maureen Donnelly; Denise LaFalce; Margaret C Krauss; Sarah E Schmitt; Joshua M Levine Journal: Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol Date: 2011-09
Authors: Alexis A Topjian; Sarah M Sánchez; Justine Shults; Robert A Berg; Dennis J Dlugos; Nicholas S Abend Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.624