OBJECTIVES: The objective of this work was to evaluate thiol-norbornene and thiol-ene-methacrylate systems as the resin phase of dental restorative materials and demonstrate their superior performance as compared to dimethacrylate materials. METHODS: Polymerization kinetics and overall functional group conversions were determined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Flexural strength and modulus were determined with a 3-point flexural test. Polymerization-induced shrinkage stress was measured with a tensometer. RESULTS: Thiol-ene polymer systems were demonstrated to exhibit advantageous properties for dental restorative materials in regards to rapid curing kinetics, high conversion, and low shrinkage and stress. However, both the thiol-norbornene and thiol-allyl ether systems studied here exhibit significant reductions in flexural strength and modulus relative to BisGMA/TEGDMA. By utilizing the thiol-ene component as the reactive diluent in dimethacrylate systems, high flexural modulus and strength are achieved while dramatically reducing the polymerization shrinkage stress. The methacrylate-thiol-allyl ether and methacrylate-thiol-norbornene systems both exhibited equivalent flexural modulus (2.1+/-0.1 GPa) and slightly reduced flexural strength (95+/-1 and 101+/-3 MPa, respectively) relative to BisGMA/TEGDMA (flexural modulus; 2.2+0.1 GPa and flexural strength; 112+/-3 MPa). Both the methacrylate-thiol-allyl ether and methacrylate-thiol-norbornene systems exhibited dramatic reductions in shrinkage stress (1.1+/-0.1 and 1.1+/-0.2 MPa, respectively) relative to BisGMA/TEGDMA (2.6+/-0.2 MPa). SIGNIFICANCE: The improved polymerization kinetics and overall functional group conversion, coupled with reductions in shrinkage stress while maintaining equivalent flexural modulus, result in a superior overall dental restorative material as compared to traditional bulk dimethacrylate resins.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this work was to evaluate thiol-norbornene and thiol-ene-methacrylate systems as the resin phase of dental restorative materials and demonstrate their superior performance as compared to dimethacrylate materials. METHODS: Polymerization kinetics and overall functional group conversions were determined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Flexural strength and modulus were determined with a 3-point flexural test. Polymerization-induced shrinkage stress was measured with a tensometer. RESULTS:Thiol-ene polymer systems were demonstrated to exhibit advantageous properties for dental restorative materials in regards to rapid curing kinetics, high conversion, and low shrinkage and stress. However, both the thiol-norbornene and thiol-allyl ether systems studied here exhibit significant reductions in flexural strength and modulus relative to BisGMA/TEGDMA. By utilizing the thiol-ene component as the reactive diluent in dimethacrylate systems, high flexural modulus and strength are achieved while dramatically reducing the polymerization shrinkage stress. The methacrylate-thiol-allyl ether and methacrylate-thiol-norbornene systems both exhibited equivalent flexural modulus (2.1+/-0.1 GPa) and slightly reduced flexural strength (95+/-1 and 101+/-3 MPa, respectively) relative to BisGMA/TEGDMA (flexural modulus; 2.2+0.1 GPa and flexural strength; 112+/-3 MPa). Both the methacrylate-thiol-allyl ether and methacrylate-thiol-norbornene systems exhibited dramatic reductions in shrinkage stress (1.1+/-0.1 and 1.1+/-0.2 MPa, respectively) relative to BisGMA/TEGDMA (2.6+/-0.2 MPa). SIGNIFICANCE: The improved polymerization kinetics and overall functional group conversion, coupled with reductions in shrinkage stress while maintaining equivalent flexural modulus, result in a superior overall dental restorative material as compared to traditional bulk dimethacrylate resins.
Authors: Benjamin D Fairbanks; Timothy F Scott; Christopher J Kloxin; Kristi S Anseth; Christopher N Bowman Journal: Macromolecules Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 5.985
Authors: Jordan E Boulden; Neil B Cramer; Kathleen M Schreck; Charles L Couch; Cora Bracho-Troconis; Jeffrey W Stansbury; Christopher N Bowman Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2010-11-30 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Han Byul Song; Xiance Wang; James R Patton; Jeffrey W Stansbury; Christopher N Bowman Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Andres Gonzalez-Bonet; Gili Kaufman; Yin Yang; Christopher Wong; Abigail Jackson; George Huyang; Rafael Bowen; Jirun Sun Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2015-09-23 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Hee Young Park; Christopher J Kloxin; Ahmed S Abuelyaman; Joe D Oxman; Christopher N Bowman Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Han Byul Song; Nancy Sowan; Parag K Shah; Austin Baranek; Alexander Flores; Jeffrey W Stansbury; Christopher N Bowman Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Jiancheng Liu; Gregory D Howard; Steven H Lewis; Matthew D Barros; Jeffrey W Stansbury Journal: Eur Polym J Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 4.598