BACKGROUND: Medication and dietary nonadherence are precipitating factors for heart failure (HF) hospitalization; however, the characteristics, outcomes, and quality of care of patients with nonadherence are unknown. Recognizing features of nonadherent patients may provide a means to reduce rehospitalization for this population. METHODS: GWTG-HF registry data were collected from 236 hospitals and 54,322 patients from January 1, 2005 to December 30, 2007. Demographics, clinical characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and quality of care were stratified by precipitating factor for HF admission. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association of nonadherence with length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Clinicians documented dietary and/or medication nonadherence as the reason for admission in 5576 (10.3%) of HF hospitalizations. Nonadherent patients were younger and more likely to be male, minority, uninsured, and have nonischemic HF. These patients had lower ejection fractions (34.9% vs 39.6%, P < .0001), more frequent previous HF hospitalizations, higher brain natriuretic peptide levels (1813 vs 1371 pg/mL, P < .0001), and presented with greater signs of congestion. Despite this, nonadherent patients had shorter LOS (odds ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.97) and lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.51-0.83) in multivariate analysis. Although nonadherent patients received high rates of Joint Commission core measures, rates of other evidence-based treatments were less optimal. CONCLUSIONS: Nonadherence is a common precipitant for HF admission. Despite a higher risk profile, nonadherent patients had lower in-hospital mortality and LOS, suggesting that it may be easier to stabilize nonadherent patients by reinstituting sodium and/or fluid restriction and resuming medical therapy.
BACKGROUND: Medication and dietary nonadherence are precipitating factors for heart failure (HF) hospitalization; however, the characteristics, outcomes, and quality of care of patients with nonadherence are unknown. Recognizing features of nonadherent patients may provide a means to reduce rehospitalization for this population. METHODS: GWTG-HF registry data were collected from 236 hospitals and 54,322 patients from January 1, 2005 to December 30, 2007. Demographics, clinical characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and quality of care were stratified by precipitating factor for HF admission. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association of nonadherence with length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Clinicians documented dietary and/or medication nonadherence as the reason for admission in 5576 (10.3%) of HF hospitalizations. Nonadherent patients were younger and more likely to be male, minority, uninsured, and have nonischemic HF. These patients had lower ejection fractions (34.9% vs 39.6%, P < .0001), more frequent previous HF hospitalizations, higher brain natriuretic peptide levels (1813 vs 1371 pg/mL, P < .0001), and presented with greater signs of congestion. Despite this, nonadherent patients had shorter LOS (odds ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.97) and lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.51-0.83) in multivariate analysis. Although nonadherent patients received high rates of Joint Commission core measures, rates of other evidence-based treatments were less optimal. CONCLUSIONS: Nonadherence is a common precipitant for HF admission. Despite a higher risk profile, nonadherent patients had lower in-hospital mortality and LOS, suggesting that it may be easier to stabilize nonadherent patients by reinstituting sodium and/or fluid restriction and resuming medical therapy.
Authors: Linda Calvillo-King; Danielle Arnold; Kathryn J Eubank; Matthew Lo; Pete Yunyongying; Heather Stieglitz; Ethan A Halm Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-10-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jia-Rong Wu; Darren A DeWalt; David W Baker; Dean Schillinger; Bernice Ruo; Kristen Bibbins-Domingo; Aurelia Macabasco-O'Connell; George M Holmes; Kimberly A Broucksou; Brian Erman; Victoria Hawk; Crystal W Cene; Christine DeLong Jones; Michael Pignone Journal: J Clin Nurs Date: 2013-12-20 Impact factor: 3.036
Authors: Debra K Moser; Victoria Dickson; Tiny Jaarsma; Christopher Lee; Anna Stromberg; Barbara Riegel Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Amar M Salam; Kadhim Sulaiman; Alawi A Alsheikh-Ali; Rajvir Singh; Khalid F AlHabib; Ibrahim Al-Zakwani; Nidal Asaad; Awad Al-Qahtani; Mohammed Al-Jarallah; Wael AlMahmeed; Bassam Bulbanat; Mustafa Ridha; Nooshin Bazargani; Haitham Amin; Ahmed Al-Motarreb; Prashanth Panduranga; Husam AlFaleh; Abdulla Shehab; Jassim Al Suwaidi Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 1.927
Authors: Richard Lowrie; Lina Johansson; Paul Forsyth; Stuart Lochhead Bryce; Susan McKellar; Niamh Fitzgerald Journal: Int J Clin Pharm Date: 2013-11-30
Authors: Jia-Rong Wu; Susan K Frazier; Mary Kay Rayens; Terry A Lennie; Misook L Chung; Debra K Moser Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2012-07-02 Impact factor: 4.267