| Literature DB >> 19781055 |
Hitomi Saito1, Yutaka Kimura, Sawako Tashima, Nana Takao, Akinori Nakagawa, Takanobu Baba, Suguru Sato.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The weight-loss effect of team medical care in which counseling is provided by clinical psychologists was investigated in an university hospital obesity (OB) clinic. Nutritional and exercise therapy were also studied. In our previous study, we conducted a randomized, controlled trial with obese patients and confirmed that subjects who received counseling lost significantly more weight than those in a non-counseling group. The purpose of this study was to identify the psychological characteristics assessed by ego states that promote behavior modification by obese patients.Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19781055 PMCID: PMC2759949 DOI: 10.1186/1751-0759-3-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biopsychosoc Med ISSN: 1751-0759
Figure 1Ego States. Berne defined three principal ego states, each with a specific origin and characteristics: Child (archaeopsyche), Parent (exteropsyche), and Adult (neopsyche). Further elaboration of ego state theory led to the recognition of two functional Parent ego states (Critical and Nurturing) and two functional Child ego states (Free and Adapted). CP stands for Critical Parent, with criticizing and regulating characteristics. NP stands for Nurturing Parent, with permitting and encouraging characteristics. A stands for Adult, focusing on gathering facts and considering alternatives and being objective. FC stands for Free Child, with self-orientation and optimistic characteristics. AC stands for Adapted Child, focusing on restraining one's emotions and with social characteristics.
Figure 2Obesity program. The hospital has a 6-month weight-loss program known as the obesity program (OB program). In this program, physicians, clinical psychologists, registered dietitians, and exercise trainers support obese patients. During the 6-month program, obese patients first consulted with a physician for blood and physical examinations. They then participated in intake interviews about their eating habits with a registered dietitian and about their current psychosocial condition with a clinical psychologist. At least once a month, the clinical psychologists met patients for individual face-to-face counseling. A meeting was held every month to discuss methods to support them and to improve their lifestyles.
Pre and post weight, BMI, and TEG category scores (Wilcoxon signed rank test).
| Weight | 83.89 | 21.00 | 77.74 | 18.07 | 7.72 | < 0.01 |
| BMI | 33.80 | 6.85 | 31.45 | 6.12 | 7.65 | < 0.01 |
| Critical Parent score | 9.78 | 4.01 | 10.39 | 4.08 | 1.69 | 0.09 |
| Nurturing Parent score | 14.60 | 4.17 | 14.46 | 4.31 | 0.44 | 0.66 |
| Adult score | 10.09 | 4.49 | 10.77 | 4.78 | 1.95 | 0.05 |
| Free Child score | 12.00 | 4.47 | 12.59 | 4.64 | 2.46 | 0.01 |
| Adapted Child score | 9.52 | 4.62 | 9.37 | 4.52 | 0.25 | 0.80 |
The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for comparisons of weight and psychological factors before and after intervention.
The TEG scores from the first session (pre-TEG) were compared to those taken on completion (post-TEG) of the program in order to identify changes in these patients' psychological characteristics before and after intervention.
Factors affecting weight loss (Multiple regression analysis).
| Pre weight | -0.58 | < 0.01 |
| Age | -0.97 | 0.37 |
| Number of nutrition therapy sessions | 0.01 | 0.93 |
| Number of counseling sessions | 0.08 | 0.37 |
| Pre-Critical Parent score | -0.06 | 0.67 |
| Pre-Nurturing Parent score | -0.15 | 0.25 |
| Pre-Adult score | -0.05 | 0.75 |
| Pre-Free Child score | 0.33 | 0.01 |
| Pre-Adapted Child score | -0.06 | 0.57 |
| Change in Critical Parent score | 0.18 | 0.09 |
| Change in Nurturing Parent score | -0.15 | 0.15 |
| Change in Adult score | -0.20 | 0.06 |
| Change in Free Child score | 0.14 | 0.18 |
| Change in Adapted Child score | 0.14 | 0.17 |
| R(R 2) | 0.66 (0.43) | |
The multiple regression analysis was used to identify factors affecting weight loss. The objective variable was the weight loss during the 6-month program. The explanatory variables were age, number of sessions of nutrition therapy and counseling, TEG scores at the first session (pre-TEG), and the changes in TEG score from the first session to the completion of the program.