Literature DB >> 19780940

Fibrosis staging in chronic hepatitis C: analysis of discordance between transient elastography and liver biopsy.

V Calvaruso1, C Cammà, V Di Marco, S Maimone, F Bronte, M Enea, V Dardanoni, P Manousou, M Pleguezuelo, E Xirouchakis, M Attanasio, G Dusheiko, A K Burroughs, A Craxì.   

Abstract

In chronic hepatitis C, transient elastography (TE) accurately identifies cirrhosis, but its ability to assess significant fibrosis (Metavir > or = F2) is variable. Constitutional and liver disease-related factors may influence TE and here we examined the variables associated with differences. Three hundred consecutive hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA positive patients had biochemical tests, TE and a biopsy performed on the same day. The Dale model was used to identify the variables associated with discordance between biopsy and elastography results. In 97 patients (34.2%), TE and histological assessment were discordant. Seventy-six of 286 (26.6%) had stage > or =F2 and TE < 7.1 kPa (false negative); 21 of 286 (7.3%) had stage <F2 and TE > or = 7.1 kPa (false positive). No patient with discordant results had cirrhosis. By Dale model, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) was found to be the unique variable significantly related (P = 0.046) with discordance between biopsy and TE. Discordance rate was 43.4% (82 patients) with AST < 1.5 x UNL vs 25.8% (25 patients) with AST > or = 1.5 x UNL (P = 0.004). False negative rate was 43.4 (82 patients) with AST < 1.5 x UNL vs 17.1% (13 patients) with AST > or = 1.5 x UNL (P < 0.001). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) for F > or = 2, according to AST < 1.5 x UNL vs > or = 1.5 x UNL were 0.738 (95% CI: 0.683-0.812) and 0.854(95% CI: 0.754-0.907). Transient elastography is not adequate on its own to rule out or to rule in significant fibrosis, as it is influenced by major variations in biochemical activity of liver disease. Liver stiffness, at low levels of AST, can underestimate fibrosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19780940     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2009.01199.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Viral Hepat        ISSN: 1352-0504            Impact factor:   3.728


  11 in total

1.  Normal values of liver elasticity measured by real-time tissue elastography (RTE) in healthy infants and children.

Authors:  Buket Selmi; Guido Engelmann; Ulrike Teufel; Saroa El Sakka; Monika Dadrich; Jens-Peter Schenk
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 2.  Acoustic radiation force elasticity imaging in diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  Joshua R Doherty; Gregg E Trahey; Kathryn R Nightingale; Mark L Palmeri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Feasibility study and control values of transient elastography in healthy children.

Authors:  Guido Engelmann; Caroline Gebhardt; Daniel Wenning; Elke Wühl; Georg F Hoffmann; Buket Selmi; Juergen Grulich-Henn; Jens Peter Schenk; Ulrike Teufel
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Measurement of real-time tissue elastography in a phantom model and comparison with transient elastography in pediatric patients with liver diseases.

Authors:  Jens-Peter Schenk; Gerhard Alzen; Volker Klingmüller; Ulrike Teufel; Saroa El Sakka; Guido Engelmann; Buket Selmi
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Static and dynamic liver stiffness: An ex vivo porcine liver study using MR elastography.

Authors:  Chun Yang; Meng Yin; Kevin J Glaser; Xiangyang Zhu; Kai Xu; Richard L Ehman; Jun Chen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 6.  Chronic hepatitis C and liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Giada Sebastiani; Konstantinos Gkouvatsos; Kostas Pantopoulos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Hepatic and splenic stiffness augmentation assessed with MR elastography in an in vivo porcine portal hypertension model.

Authors:  Meng Yin; Arunark Kolipaka; David A Woodrum; Kevin J Glaser; Anthony J Romano; Armando Manduca; Jayant A Talwalkar; Philip A Araoz; Kiaran P McGee; Nandan S Anavekar; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Liver Hemangioma Might Lead to overestimation of Liver Fibrosis by Fibroscan; A Missed Issue in Two Cases.

Authors:  Seyed Hossein Aalaei-Andabili; Leila Mehrnoush; Shima Salimi; Mustafa Shafiei; Seyed Moayed Alavian
Journal:  Hepat Mon       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 0.660

Review 9.  Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Vasilios Papastergiou; Emmanuel Tsochatzis; Andrew K Burroughs
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2012

Review 10.  Liver stiffness: a novel parameter for the diagnosis of liver disease.

Authors:  Sebastian Mueller; Laurent Sandrin
Journal:  Hepat Med       Date:  2010-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.