Literature DB >> 19780576

Ligand prediction for orphan targets using support vector machines and various target-ligand kernels is dominated by nearest neighbor effects.

Anne Mai Wassermann1, Hanna Geppert, Jürgen Bajorath.   

Abstract

Support vector machine (SVM) calculations combining protein and small molecule information have been applied to identify ligands for simulated orphan targets (i.e., targets for which no ligands were available). The combination of protein and ligand information was facilitated through the design of target-ligand kernel functions that account for pairwise ligand and target similarity. The design and biological information content of such kernel functions was expected to play a major role for target-directed ligand prediction. Therefore, a variety of target-ligand kernels were implemented to capture different types of target information including sequence, secondary structure, tertiary structure, biophysical properties, ontologies, or structural taxonomy. These kernels were tested in ligand predictions for simulated orphan targets in two target protein systems characterized by the presence of different intertarget relationships. Surprisingly, although there were target- and set-specific differences in prediction rates for alternative target-ligand kernels, the performance of these kernels was overall similar and also similar to SVM linear combinations. Test calculations designed to better understand possible reasons for these observations revealed that ligand information provided by nearest neighbors of orphan targets significantly influenced SVM performance, much more so than the inclusion of protein information. As long as ligands of closely related neighbors of orphan targets were available for SVM learning, orphan target ligands could be well predicted, regardless of the type and sophistication of the kernel function that was used. These findings suggest simplified strategies for SVM-based ligand prediction for orphan targets.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19780576     DOI: 10.1021/ci9002624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  8 in total

1.  Analysis of multiple compound-protein interactions reveals novel bioactive molecules.

Authors:  Hiroaki Yabuuchi; Satoshi Niijima; Hiromu Takematsu; Tomomi Ida; Takatsugu Hirokawa; Takafumi Hara; Teppei Ogawa; Yohsuke Minowa; Gozoh Tsujimoto; Yasushi Okuno
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 11.429

2.  Evolution of Support Vector Machine and Regression Modeling in Chemoinformatics and Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Raquel Rodríguez-Pérez; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 4.179

3.  Computational chemogenomics: is it more than inductive transfer?

Authors:  J B Brown; Yasushi Okuno; Gilles Marcou; Alexandre Varnek; Dragos Horvath
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  A ranking method for the concurrent learning of compounds with various activity profiles.

Authors:  Alexander Dörr; Lars Rosenbaum; Andreas Zell
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.514

5.  Drug-target interaction prediction via class imbalance-aware ensemble learning.

Authors:  Ali Ezzat; Min Wu; Xiao-Li Li; Chee-Keong Kwoh
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  Machine learning approaches and databases for prediction of drug-target interaction: a survey paper.

Authors:  Maryam Bagherian; Elyas Sabeti; Kai Wang; Maureen A Sartor; Zaneta Nikolovska-Coleska; Kayvan Najarian
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 11.622

7.  Predicting Drug-Target Interactions for New Drug Compounds Using a Weighted Nearest Neighbor Profile.

Authors:  Twan van Laarhoven; Elena Marchiori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Predicting kinase inhibitors using bioactivity matrix derived informer sets.

Authors:  Huikun Zhang; Spencer S Ericksen; Ching-Pei Lee; Gene E Ananiev; Nathan Wlodarchak; Peng Yu; Julie C Mitchell; Anthony Gitter; Stephen J Wright; F Michael Hoffmann; Scott A Wildman; Michael A Newton
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 4.475

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.