Literature DB >> 19780032

Long-term outcomes from the English national comparative audit of surgery for nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis.

Claire Hopkins1, Robert Slack, Valerie Lund, Peter Brown, Lynn Copley, John Browne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: We present a large, prospective cohort study following patients who underwent surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), with or without nasal polyps, in hospitals in England and Wales. Five-year outcomes will be reported, and we will revisit a previous analysis of the effectiveness of extensive surgery in the treatment of nasal polyposis.
METHODS: Baseline clinical data was collected for 3,128 patients undergoing surgery for CRS (with or without nasal polyps). Outcomes are described in terms of the proportion of patients undergoing revision surgery and mean Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores.
RESULTS: A total of 1,459 (52.2%) patients responded to 5-year follow-up. Revision surgery rates increased at each time point. Of the patients responding, 279 patients (19.1%) had undergone further surgery during the 5 years since their original operation. Of the patients with polyps, 20.6% had undergone revision compared to 15.5% of patients with CRS alone. The mean SNOT-22 score for all patients was 28.2 (standard deviation [SD] = 22.4) at 5 years after surgery. This is remarkably similar to the results observed at 3 months (25.5), 12 months (27.7), and 36 months (27.7), and represents a 14-point improvement over the baseline score. Polyp patients report better SNOT-22 scores at 5 years (mean = 26.2; SD = 21.6) than patients with CRS alone (mean = 33.3; SD = 23.7). Of the patients who had originally received simple polypectomy, 21.2% had undergone revision surgery compared to 20.0% of patients who had also received additional sinus surgery. The difference in unadjusted revision surgery rates is not statistically significant (chi(2) = 0.22; P = .64). However, the difference becomes statistically significant when a multivariate logistic regression is used to adjust for baseline characteristics, with patients undergoing additional sinus surgery being less likely to undergo further surgery within the study period (adjusted odds ratio = 0.66; P = .04).
CONCLUSIONS: We have shown sinonasal surgery to be safe and effective in reducing the symptoms associated with CRS over a 5-year period. The reduction in symptoms is large, with no significant decline in symptomatic improvement from 12 to 60 months postsurgery. However, revision surgery rates approach 20% over this time, and patients should be counseled accordingly prior to surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19780032     DOI: 10.1002/lary.20653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  55 in total

1.  [Rhinosinusitis guidelines--unabridged version: S2 guidelines from the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery].

Authors:  B A Stuck; C Bachert; P Federspil; W Hosemann; L Klimek; R Mösges; O Pfaar; C Rudack; H Sitter; M Wagenmann; R Weber; K Hörmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Surgical versus medical interventions in CRS and nasal polyps: comparative evidence between medical and surgical efficacy.

Authors:  Osama Dessouky; Claire Hopkins
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 3.  Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

Review 4.  Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Nasal Polyps.

Authors:  Seong Ho Cho; Dae Woo Kim; Philippe Gevaert
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

5.  Long-term revision rates for endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Kristine A Smith; Richard R Orlandi; Gretchen Oakley; Huong Meeks; Karen Curtin; Jeremiah A Alt
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.858

6.  Efficacy of ESS in chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyposis: a Danish cohort study.

Authors:  Henrik Lind; G Joergensen; B Lange; F Svendstrup; A D Kjeldsen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Surgical treatment for nasal polyposis: predictors of outcome.

Authors:  Marko Velimir Grgić; Hrvoje Ćupić; Livije Kalogjera; Tomislav Baudoin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Danger points, complications and medico-legal aspects in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  W Hosemann; C Draf
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

Review 9.  Evidence-based surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps.

Authors:  Christos Georgalas; Marjolein Cornet; Gwijde Adriaensen; Susanne Reinartz; Carlijn Holland; Emmanuel Prokopakis; Wytske Fokkens
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.806

10.  Endotypes and phenotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis: a PRACTALL document of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.

Authors:  Cezmi A Akdis; Claus Bachert; Cemal Cingi; Mark S Dykewicz; Peter W Hellings; Robert M Naclerio; Robert P Schleimer; Dennis Ledford
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 10.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.