Literature DB >> 19780001

[Comparison of non-invasive and invasive techniques in the treatment of patients with myofascial pain syndrome].

Kürşat Gül1, Selami Ateş Onal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We compared in this study the efficiency of non-invasive techniques including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and laser treatments with invasive techniques including lidocaine and botulinum toxin-A injection in patients with myofascial pain syndrome (MPS).
METHODS: One hundred patients who admitted to Firat University Hospital Pain Department and who were diagnosed as MPS were included in the study. Patients were randomized into four groups of 25 patients each. Sixty sessions of TENS and 20 sessions of laser treatments were performed in the first and second groups, respectively. Lidocaine and botulinum toxin-A were injected in the third and fourth groups, respectively. 2 ml (20 mg) 1% lidocaine was injected in each patient twice a week for one month in Group III. 25 U (0.5 ml) of botulinum toxin-A was injected in each patient only once in Group IV. Pain was evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS), palpable muscle spasm scoring (PMSS) and anesthesiometer at baseline, 15, 30 and 45 days.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to age, sex and education level. Pain control was statistically better in Group IV compared with the other groups with respect to VAS, PMSS and anesthesiometer scores.
CONCLUSION: Botulinum toxin-A injection provided better pain control when compared to trigger point injection with lidocaine and non-invasive techniques including TENS and laser treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19780001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Agri        ISSN: 1300-0012


  8 in total

Review 1.  Botulinum toxin treatment of myofascial pain: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Robert Gerwin
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-10

Review 2.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for acute pain.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Carole A Paley; Tracey E Howe; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-15

3.  Myofascial pain syndrome: a treatment review.

Authors:  Mehul J Desai; Vikramjeet Saini; Shawnjeet Saini
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2013-02-12

4.  Benefits, Safety, and Adjunct Modality Prevalences of Long-Term Botulinum Toxin Injections for Cervical Dystonia and Myofascial Neck Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Dion Diep; Jasmine Ko; John Lan; Kinga T Koprowicz; Gordon Ko
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Effectiveness of low-level gallium aluminium arsenide laser therapy for temporomandibular disorder with myofascial pain: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuelian Wu; Jiang Zhu; Bing Zheng; Jie Liu; Zonghui Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Botulinum toxin for the treatment of myofascial pain syndromes involving the neck and back: a review from a clinical perspective.

Authors:  José M Climent; Ta-Shen Kuan; Pedro Fenollosa; Francisco Martin-Del-Rosario
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.629

7.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Ana Luiza C Martimbianco; Gustavo Jm Porfírio; Rafael L Pacheco; Maria Regina Torloni; Rachel Riera
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-12

8.  Evaluation of the Sympathetic Skin Response to the Dry Needling Treatment in Female Myofascial Pain Syndrome Patients.

Authors:  Ali Veysel Ozden; Hasan Kerem Alptekin; Sina Esmaeilzadeh; Cem Cihan; Semih Aki; Cihan Aksoy; Julide Oncu
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2016-05-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.