Literature DB >> 19779220

Modeling silicon diode energy response factors for use in therapeutic photon beams.

Karin Eklund1, Anders Ahnesjö.   

Abstract

Silicon diodes have good spatial resolution, which makes them advantageous over ionization chambers for dosimetry in fields with high dose gradients. However, silicon diodes overrespond to low-energy photons, that are more abundant in scatter which increase with large fields and larger depths. We present a cavity-theory-based model for a general response function for silicon detectors at arbitrary positions within photon fields. The model uses photon and electron spectra calculated from fluence pencil kernels. The incident photons are treated according to their energy through a bipartition of the primary beam photon spectrum into low- and high-energy components. Primary electrons from the high-energy component are treated according to Spencer-Attix cavity theory. Low-energy primary photons together with all scattered photons are treated according to large cavity theory supplemented with an energy-dependent factor K(E) to compensate for energy variations in the electron equilibrium. The depth variation of the response for an unshielded silicon detector has been calculated for 5 x 5 cm(2), 10 x 10 cm(2) and 20 x 20 cm(2) fields in 6 and 15 MV beams and compared with measurements showing that our model calculates response factors with deviations less than 0.6%. An alternative method is also proposed, where we show that one can use a correlation with the scatter factor to determine the detector response of silicon diodes with an error of less than 3% in 6 MV and 15 MV photon beams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19779220     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/20/007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  3 in total

1.  Radiological tissue equivalence of deformable silicone-based chemical radiation dosimeters (FlexyDos3D).

Authors:  Yi Du; Ruoxi Wang; Meijiao Wang; Haizhen Yue; Yibao Zhang; Hao Wu; Weihu Wang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Implementation and Challenges of International Atomic Energy Agency/American Association of Physicists in Medicine TRS 483 Formalism for Field Output Factors and Involved Uncertainties Determination in Small Fields for TomoTherapy.

Authors:  Rajesh Kinhikar; Suryakant Kaushik; Chandrashekhar Tambe; Sudarshan Kadam; Shrikant Kale; Rituraj Upreti
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2021-09-08

3.  CyberKnife® fixed cone and Iris™ defined small radiation fields: Assessment with a high-resolution solid-state detector array.

Authors:  Giordano Biasi; Marco Petasecca; Susanna Guatelli; Ebert A Martin; Garry Grogan; Benjamin Hug; Jonathan Lane; Vladimir Perevertaylo; Tomas Kron; Anatoly B Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.