Literature DB >> 19779001

Geometric and compositional appearance of atheroma in an angiographically normal carotid artery in patients with atherosclerosis.

L Dong1, H R Underhill, W Yu, H Ota, T S Hatsukami, T L Gao, Z Zhang, M Oikawa, X Zhao, C Yuan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Arterial remodeling may enable atherosclerotic disease without luminal stenosis. We sought to assess the prevalence and characteristics of atherosclerosis in angiographically normal carotid arteries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six arteries with 0% stenosis by MRA were evaluated with multicontrast carotid MR imaging at 3T. For each artery, the percentage wall volume (wall volume/[lumen volume + wall volume] x 100%) and the presence versus absence of an LRNC, calcification, IPH, and fibrous cap rupture were recorded. In addition, the relative size of each plaque component (eg, percentage LRNC = LRNC volume/wall volume x 100%), when present, was calculated.
RESULTS: The mean of percentage wall volume in arteries with 0% stenosis was 43.0 +/- 6.9% with a range from 31.6% to 60.1%. An LRNC was present in 67.4% (31/46) of arteries, calcification was present in 65.2% (30/46), IPH was present in 8.7% (4/46), and fibrous cap rupture was present in 4.3% (2/46). In arteries with an LRNC (n = 31), the average percentage LRNC volume was 8.8 +/- 7.3% with a range from 1.0% to 31.5%. For calcification (n = 30), the mean percentage calcification volume was 3.8 +/- 4.2% with a range of 0.1%-17.4%. The mean percentage IPH volume (n = 4) was 2.7 +/- 1.7% with a range of 0.5%-4.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that stenosis by MRA may underestimate the presence of carotid atherosclerosis, and they demonstrate the need for improved methods for accurately identifying carotid atherosclerotic plaque severity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19779001      PMCID: PMC7964153          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  29 in total

1.  T1-insensitive flow suppression using quadruple inversion-recovery.

Authors:  Vasily L Yarnykh; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography with high-resolution black blood cardiovascular magnetic resonance for assessing carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Lukasz S Babiarz; Brad Astor; Mona A Mohamed; Bruce A Wasserman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  Endarterectomy for moderate symptomatic carotid stenosis: interim results from the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-06-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Visualization of fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque in vivo with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  T S Hatsukami; R Ross; N L Polissar; C Yuan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-08-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W S Moore; H J Barnett; H G Beebe; E F Bernstein; B J Brener; T Brott; L R Caplan; A Day; J Goldstone; R W Hobson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Why do plaques rupture?

Authors:  E Falk
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Steven E Nissen; E Murat Tuzcu; Paul Schoenhagen; B Greg Brown; Peter Ganz; Robert A Vogel; Tim Crowe; Gail Howard; Christopher J Cooper; Bruce Brodie; Cindy L Grines; Anthony N DeMaria
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI--initial results.

Authors:  Norihide Takaya; Chun Yuan; Baocheng Chu; Tobias Saam; Hunter Underhill; Jianming Cai; Nam Tran; Nayak L Polissar; Carol Isaac; Marina S Ferguson; Gwenn A Garden; Steven C Cramer; Kenneth R Maravilla; Beverly Hashimoto; Thomas S Hatsukami
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Equivalence of measurements of carotid stenosis. A comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors:  P M Rothwell; R J Gibson; J Slattery; R J Sellar; C P Warlow
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  21 in total

1.  Discriminating carotid atherosclerotic lesion severity by luminal stenosis and plaque burden: a comparison utilizing high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Xihai Zhao; Hunter R Underhill; Qian Zhao; Jianming Cai; Feiyu Li; Minako Oikawa; Li Dong; Hideki Ota; Thomas S Hatsukami; Baocheng Chu; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  MRI of carotid atherosclerosis.

Authors:  William S Kerwin; Thomas Hatsukami; Chun Yuan; Xue-Qiao Zhao
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Prediction of high-risk plaque development and plaque progression with the carotid atherosclerosis score.

Authors:  Dongxiang Xu; Daniel S Hippe; Hunter R Underhill; Minako Oikawa-Wakayama; Li Dong; Kiyofumi Yamada; Chun Yuan; Thomas S Hatsukami
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-03-13

4.  Signal of Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage on MR T1-Weighted Imaging: Association with Acute Cerebral Infarct.

Authors:  D Yang; Y Liu; Y Han; D Li; W Wang; R Li; C Yuan; X Zhao
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Imaging biomarkers of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Jinnan Wang; Niranjan Balu; Gador Canton; Chun Yuan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Sustained acceleration in carotid atherosclerotic plaque progression with intraplaque hemorrhage: a long-term time course study.

Authors:  Jie Sun; Hunter R Underhill; Daniel S Hippe; Yunjing Xue; Chun Yuan; Thomas S Hatsukami
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-08

7.  Association of carotid atherosclerotic plaque features with acute ischemic stroke: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Huilin Zhao; Xihai Zhao; Xiaosheng Liu; Ye Cao; Daniel S Hippe; Jie Sun; Feiyu Li; Jianrong Xu; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  A noninvasive imaging approach to assess plaque severity: the carotid atherosclerosis score.

Authors:  H R Underhill; T S Hatsukami; J Cai; W Yu; J K DeMarco; N L Polissar; H Ota; X Zhao; L Dong; M Oikawa; C Yuan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  The added value of longitudinal black-blood cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography in the cross sectional identification of carotid atherosclerotic ulceration.

Authors:  Wei Yu; Hunter R Underhill; Marina S Ferguson; Daniel S Hippe; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan; Baocheng Chu
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in carotid atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Li Dong; William S Kerwin; Marina S Ferguson; Rui Li; Jinnan Wang; Huijun Chen; Gador Canton; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.