OBJECTIVES: This study explored the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on left ventricular (LV) twist, particularly in relation to LV lead position. BACKGROUND: LV twist is emerging as a comprehensive index of LV function. METHODS: Eighty heart failure patients were included. Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed at baseline, immediately after CRT, and at 6-month follow-up. Speckle-tracking analysis was applied to assess LV twist. The LV lead was placed preferably in a (postero)lateral vein, and at fluoroscopy, the position was classified as basal, midventricular, or apical. Response to CRT was defined as reduction of LV end-systolic volume>or=15% at 6-month follow-up. A control group comprised 30 normal subjects. RESULTS: Peak LV twist in heart failure patients was 4.8+/-2.6 degrees compared with 15.0+/-3.6 degrees in the control subjects (p<0.001). At 6-month follow-up, peak LV twist significantly improved only in responders (56%), from 4.3+/-2.4 degrees to 8.5+/-3.2 degrees (p<0.001). The strongest predictor of response to CRT was the improvement of peak LV twist immediately after CRT (odds ratio: 1.899, 95% confidence interval: 1.334 to 2.703, p<0.001). Furthermore, LV twist significantly improved in patients with an apical (from 4.3+/-3.1 degrees to 8.6+/-3.0 degrees, p=0.001) and midventricular (from 4.8+/-2.2 degrees to 6.4+/-3.9 degrees, p=0.038) but not with a basal (5.0+/-3.3 degrees vs. 4.1+/-3.2 degrees, p=0.28) LV lead position. Similarly, LV ejection fraction significantly increased in patients with an apical (from 26+/-7% to 37+/-7%, p<0.001) and midventricular (from 26+/-6% to 33+/-8%, p<0.001) but not with a basal (26+/-5% vs. 28+/-8%, p=0.30) LV lead position. CONCLUSIONS: An immediate improvement of LV twist after CRT predicts LV reverse remodeling at 6-month follow-up.
OBJECTIVES: This study explored the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on left ventricular (LV) twist, particularly in relation to LV lead position. BACKGROUND: LV twist is emerging as a comprehensive index of LV function. METHODS: Eighty heart failurepatients were included. Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed at baseline, immediately after CRT, and at 6-month follow-up. Speckle-tracking analysis was applied to assess LV twist. The LV lead was placed preferably in a (postero)lateral vein, and at fluoroscopy, the position was classified as basal, midventricular, or apical. Response to CRT was defined as reduction of LV end-systolic volume>or=15% at 6-month follow-up. A control group comprised 30 normal subjects. RESULTS: Peak LV twist in heart failurepatients was 4.8+/-2.6 degrees compared with 15.0+/-3.6 degrees in the control subjects (p<0.001). At 6-month follow-up, peak LV twist significantly improved only in responders (56%), from 4.3+/-2.4 degrees to 8.5+/-3.2 degrees (p<0.001). The strongest predictor of response to CRT was the improvement of peak LV twist immediately after CRT (odds ratio: 1.899, 95% confidence interval: 1.334 to 2.703, p<0.001). Furthermore, LV twist significantly improved in patients with an apical (from 4.3+/-3.1 degrees to 8.6+/-3.0 degrees, p=0.001) and midventricular (from 4.8+/-2.2 degrees to 6.4+/-3.9 degrees, p=0.038) but not with a basal (5.0+/-3.3 degrees vs. 4.1+/-3.2 degrees, p=0.28) LV lead position. Similarly, LV ejection fraction significantly increased in patients with an apical (from 26+/-7% to 37+/-7%, p<0.001) and midventricular (from 26+/-6% to 33+/-8%, p<0.001) but not with a basal (26+/-5% vs. 28+/-8%, p=0.30) LV lead position. CONCLUSIONS: An immediate improvement of LV twist after CRT predicts LV reverse remodeling at 6-month follow-up.
Authors: Dominique Auger; Gabe B Bleeker; Matteo Bertini; See H Ewe; Rutger J van Bommel; Tomasz G Witkowski; Arnold C T Ng; Lieselot van Erven; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax; Victoria Delgado Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Michael J Bonios; Antigone Koliopoulou; Omar Wever-Pinzon; Iosif Taleb; Josef Stehlik; Weining Xu; James Wever-Pinzon; Anna Catino; Abdallah G Kfoury; Benjamin D Horne; Jose Nativi-Nicolau; Stamatis N Adamopoulos; James C Fang; Craig H Selzman; Jeroen J Bax; Stavros G Drakos Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Alice Wang; Santos E Cabreriza; Bin Cheng; Jack S Shanewise; Henry M Spotnitz Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: Naomi D Herz; Joseph Engeda; Robbert Zusterzeel; William E Sanders; Kathryn M O'Callaghan; David G Strauss; Samantha B Jacobs; Kimberly A Selzman; Ileana L Piña; Daniel A Caños Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 2.681