Literature DB >> 19778474

Analytical identification of additional impurities in urinary-derived gonadotrophins.

R Bassett1, M Lispi, D Ceccarelli, L Grimaldi, M Mancinelli, F Martelli, A Van Dorsselaer.   

Abstract

Advances in proteomic technology have enabled contaminant proteins to be identified from complex protein mixtures. The purity of two purified urinary gonadotrophin products, human menopausal gonadotrophin (u-HMG) and human FSH (u-hFSH), was compared with a preparation of recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH). After separation by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), western blot analysis showed that the recombinant preparation contained only FSH, whereas the urine-derived preparations exhibited several non-FSH or LH-related bands. These urinary components were further investigated by a proteomic approach using two-dimensional SDS-PAGE followed by mass spectrometric identification. The proteomic approach detected a total of 23 non-gonadotrophin-related proteins, at variable levels in different batches of the urine-derived preparations. Of these, 16 co-purified proteins have not been previously reported to be present in urine-derived gonadotrophins. These results indicate that the process used to purify urinary gonadotrophins may not remove all non-gonadotrophin proteins. By using a comprehensive proteomic approach, it has been shown that the recombinant FSH preparation has greater purity than either of the urine-derived preparations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19778474     DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60163-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  10 in total

1.  Efficacy of different gonadotropin combinations to support ovulation induction in WHO type I anovulation infertility: clinical evidences of human recombinant FSH/human recombinant LH in a 2:1 ratio and highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation protocols.

Authors:  D Carone; C Caropreso; A Vitti; R Chiappetta
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 2.  Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone produces more oocytes with a lower total dose per cycle in assisted reproductive technologies compared with highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Lehert; Joan C Schertz; Diego Ezcurra
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 5.211

3.  Detection of prion protein in urine-derived injectable fertility products by a targeted proteomic approach.

Authors:  Alain Van Dorsselaer; Christine Carapito; François Delalande; Christine Schaeffer-Reiss; Daniele Thierse; Hélène Diemer; Douglas S McNair; Daniel Krewski; Neil R Cashman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A 2:1 formulation of follitropin alfa and lutropin alfa in routine clinical practice: a large, multicentre, observational study.

Authors:  Klaus Bühler; Olaf Naether
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.260

5.  Managing infertility with the follitropin alfa prefilled pen injector - patient considerations.

Authors:  Klaus Bühler
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 6.  Gonadotropin therapy in assisted reproduction: an evolutionary perspective from biologics to biotech.

Authors:  Rogério de Barros F Leão; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 7.  Profile of follitropin alpha/lutropin alpha combination for the stimulation of follicular development in women with severe luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone deficiency.

Authors:  Leonardo Rinaldi; Helmy Selman
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2016-05-25

8.  Comparative Assessment of the Structural Features of Originator Recombinant Human Follitropin Alfa Versus Recombinant Human Follitropin Alfa Biosimilar Preparations Approved in Non-European Regions.

Authors:  Lucio Manzi; Nunzio Sepe; Walter Migliaccio; Ludovica Lanzoni; Luisa Iozzino; Fabrizia D'Angelo; Lucia Colarusso; Susana Montenegro; Angelo Palmese; Thomas D'Hooghe; Alfredo Ulloa-Aguirre; Yulia Koloda; Monica Lispi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 9.  Human recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) compared to urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction: a literature review and cost evaluation.

Authors:  P E Levi Setti; C Alviggi; G L Colombo; C Pisanelli; C Ripellino; S Longobardi; P L Canonico; G De Placido
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  Clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive technology treatment by using a self-injection of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin as the final maturation trigger.

Authors:  Koji Nakagawa; Midori Oba; Kaori Ehara; Nozomi Ishigaki; Nao Ino; Akiko Itakura; Ryo Tsutsumi; Katsuki Nakao; Yuko Ojiro; Rikikazu Sugiyama
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-03-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.