Literature DB >> 19778287

The rate of manual peripheral blood smear reviews in outpatients.

Paul Froom1, Rosa Havis, Mira Barak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The International Consensus Group for Hematology Review recommends manual blood smears for new findings from automated complete blood cell (CBC) tests. However, in outpatients, the rate of peripheral manual blood smear reviews is uncertain, as is the effect of historical results on this rate.
METHODS: In a prospective cohort study of 687,955 members of a health maintenance organization, we extracted 39,759 consecutive automated CBC test results and determined the rate of manual peripheral smear reviews that were indicated using different triggering criteria, and historical results.
RESULTS: Individual triggering values increased from 10.7% to 19.5% when comparing our criteria to those of the consensus criteria. The proportion of CBC test results with at least one triggering value was 7.2% using our criteria, compared to 13.9% with the inclusion of a mean corpuscular volume <75 and a plus one immature granulocyte flag according to the consensus committee. Availability of historical data decreased our peripheral smear review rate to 2.6%.
CONCLUSIONS: The peripheral smear review rate in outpatients using the consensus criteria was higher than with our less stringent criteria. If historical data are available and no clinical utility is demonstrated for the additional consensus criteria, an acceptable out-patient review rate might be as low as 2.6%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19778287     DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2009.308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  Spectral-spatial feature-based neural network method for acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell identification via microscopic hyperspectral imaging technology.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Jianbiao Wang; Mei Zhou; Qingli Li; Yiting Wang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Validation rules for blood smear revision after automated hematological testing using Mindray CAL-8000.

Authors:  Sabrina Buoro; Tommaso Mecca; Michela Seghezzi; Barbara Manenti; Giovanna Azzarà; Cosimo Ottomano; Giuseppe Lippi
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  A Comparison of Mindray BC-6800, Sysmex XN-2000, and Beckman Coulter LH750 Automated Hematology Analyzers: A Pediatric Study.

Authors:  Olga Ciepiela; Iwona Kotuła; Szymon Kierat; Sandra Sieczkowska; Anna Podsiadłowska; Anna Jenczelewska; Karolina Księżarczyk; Urszula Demkow
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Peripheral Smear Review and Bone Marrow Biopsy Correlation.

Authors:  Adrian R Bersabe; James K Aden; Nathan M Shumway; Michael B Osswald
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-06-01

5.  To follow or not to follow the recommendations regarding microscopic analysis of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute H20-A2 to validate the criteria for blood smear review?

Authors:  Samuel Ricardo Comar; Mariester Malvezzi; Ricardo Pasquini
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2014-11-21

6.  Utility of Peripheral Film Findings and its Correlation with Automated Analyzer - An Audit from Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Sidra Asad; Imran Ahmed; Natasha Ali
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

7.  Use of Middleware Data to Dissect and Optimize Hematology Autoverification.

Authors:  Rachel D Starks; Anna E Merrill; Scott R Davis; Dena R Voss; Pamela J Goldsmith; Bonnie S Brown; Jeff Kulhavy; Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2021-04-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.