Literature DB >> 1977785

The use of antihistamines in the prevention and treatment of anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions.

P Lieberman1.   

Abstract

The pathophysiologic effects of histamine in anaphylaxis have been shown to be mediated through H1 and H2 receptors, individually and in combination. H1 receptors mediate coronary artery vasoconstriction, wheezing, cutaneous vascular permeability, and possibly an increase in pulse rate. H2 receptors stimulate ventricular and atrial inotropy, arterial chronotropy, coronary vasodilation, and rises in basophil cyclic adenosine 3':5' monophosphate (cyclic AMP). (Neither receptor mediates increases in cyclic AMP in mast cells.) H1 and H2 receptors in combination seem to be most potent in mediating flush, headache, increases in pulse pressure, and decreases in diastolic blood pressure. Clinical trials have been conducted to determine the efficacy of H1 and H2 antagonists in preventing anaphylactic reactions to plasma expanders, anesthesia-inducing agents, morphine, and radiocontrast material. Concurrently, retrospective observations of the prevention of anaphylactic reactions to chymopapain have been recorded. Despite some conflicting and inconclusive data, the sum of these studies indicates that pretreatment with a combination of H1 and H2 antagonists is more effective than H1 antagonists alone in preventing reactions to these agents. These results, when added to the available knowledge of the physiology of histamine release, support the preferential use of H1/H2 antagonist combinations in the prevention and treatment of anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1977785     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6749(05)80241-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  15 in total

Review 1.  Antivenom therapy in the Americas.

Authors:  K Heard; G F O'Malley; R C Dart
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Anne K Ellis; James H Day
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Prevention of anaphylactic reactions to anaesthetic drugs.

Authors:  Malcolm M Fisher; Gordon S Doig
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  8 management of allergy, rashes, and itching.

Authors:  M Langran; C Laird
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 5.  Treatment of acute anaphylaxis.

Authors:  M Fisher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-16

Review 6.  Therapeutic controversies in the management of acute anaphylaxis.

Authors:  A F Brown
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1998-03

7.  Anaphylactic shock ensuing therapeutic puncture of an echinococcal cyst.

Authors:  Joachim Richter; Efim Profis; Martha C Holtfreter; Arzu Orhun; Irmela Müller-Stöver; Hülya Dedelen; Ralf Kubitz
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 2.289

8.  A potent tryptase inhibitor nafamostat mesilate dramatically suppressed pulmonary dysfunction induced in rats by a radiographic contrast medium.

Authors:  Toshiaki Sendo; Yoshinori Itoh; Takeshi Goromaru; Tomoko Sumimura; Mami Saito; Keisei Aki; Takahisa Yano; Ryozo Oishi
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 9.  Effects of antihistamine medications on exercise performance. Implications for sportspeople.

Authors:  L C Montgomery; P A Deuster
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 10.  Methylene blue for distributive shock: a potential new use of an old antidote.

Authors:  David H Jang; Lewis S Nelson; Robert S Hoffman
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2013-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.