BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and efficiency of a protocol for glycemic control in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with neurovascular or head injury. METHODS: Two cohorts of 50 consecutive patients admitted to the ICU with an admission diagnosis of neurovascular or head injury before and after protocol implementation were evaluated. All patients in the interventional cohort received insulin using a standardized intravenous insulin infusion protocol targeting blood glucose levels of 7-9 mmol/l. Efficiency (time to reach and time within target range), safety (hypoglycemia), and nursing compliance (protocol violations) were evaluated. RESULTS: The median time to reach the target blood glucose range was shorter in the interventional cohort than the conventional cohort (5.0 h [0.5-20.5 h] vs. 12.9 h [1.3-90.3 h]; P < 0.001). More time was spent within target range in the interventional cohort than in the conventional cohort (36.4 +/- 16.3% vs. 27.1 +/- 19.0%; P < 0.001). The median prevalence of mild (<4.9 mmol/l) hypoglycemia (0 [0-1.11]% vs. 0.58 [0-2.79]%; P < 0.001) and moderate (<3.9) hypoglycemia (0[0-0.55]% vs. 0 [1-1.25]%; p < 0.001) was significantly lower in the interventional cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The intravenous insulin infusion protocol improved the safety and efficiency of glycemic control for ICU patients with neurovascular or head injury.
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and efficiency of a protocol for glycemic control in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with neurovascular or head injury. METHODS: Two cohorts of 50 consecutive patients admitted to the ICU with an admission diagnosis of neurovascular or head injury before and after protocol implementation were evaluated. All patients in the interventional cohort received insulin using a standardized intravenous insulin infusion protocol targeting blood glucose levels of 7-9 mmol/l. Efficiency (time to reach and time within target range), safety (hypoglycemia), and nursing compliance (protocol violations) were evaluated. RESULTS: The median time to reach the target blood glucose range was shorter in the interventional cohort than the conventional cohort (5.0 h [0.5-20.5 h] vs. 12.9 h [1.3-90.3 h]; P < 0.001). More time was spent within target range in the interventional cohort than in the conventional cohort (36.4 +/- 16.3% vs. 27.1 +/- 19.0%; P < 0.001). The median prevalence of mild (<4.9 mmol/l) hypoglycemia (0 [0-1.11]% vs. 0.58 [0-2.79]%; P < 0.001) and moderate (<3.9) hypoglycemia (0[0-0.55]% vs. 0 [1-1.25]%; p < 0.001) was significantly lower in the interventional cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The intravenous insulin infusion protocol improved the safety and efficiency of glycemic control for ICU patients with neurovascular or head injury.
Authors: Paul Vespa; Robert Boonyaputthikul; David L McArthur; Chad Miller; Maria Etchepare; Marvin Bergsneider; Thomas Glenn; Neil Martin; David Hovda Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Christopher S Gray; Anthony J Hildreth; Peter A Sandercock; Janice E O'Connell; Donna E Johnston; Niall E F Cartlidge; John M Bamford; Oliver F James; K George M M Alberti Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Mathijs Vogelzang; Johanna M M Nijboer; Iwan C C van der Horst; Felix Zijlstra; Henk Jan ten Duis; Maarten W N Nijsten Journal: J Trauma Date: 2006-04
Authors: Salmaan Kanji; Avinder Singh; Michael Tierney; Hilary Meggison; Lauralyn McIntyre; Paul C Hebert Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-03-20 Impact factor: 17.440