Literature DB >> 19777195

Prognostic significance of lymph node metastases in pancreatic head cancer treated with extended lymphadenectomy: not just a matter of numbers.

Paolo Massucco1, Dario Ribero, Enrico Sgotto, Alfredo Mellano, Andrea Muratore, Lorenzo Capussotti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of variables related to nodal involvement (node status, number of disease-positive nodes [posNn], node ratio [Nr], and site of nodal metastases) in patients with resected pancreatic head cancer remains poorly defined.
METHODS: Clinical, operative, and pathologic data, including indexes of the burden and extent of nodal involvement, were analyzed in a consecutive series of 77 patients who underwent resection with extended lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (77%) were found to have lymph node (LN) metastases. Median LN count, posNn, and Nr were 28 (10-54), 4 (1-29), and 14% (2%-55%), respectively. Twenty-six patients (44% of N1) had metastases limited to node level (NL) 1 (i.e., peripancreatic nodes); metastases up to NL2 (nodes along main arteries and hepatic hilum) and NL3 (preaortic nodes) were found in 21 (36%) and 12 (20%) patients, respectively. Interestingly, survival of patients with positive LN limited to NL1 was similar to that of node-negative patients (P = 0.407). posNn, Nr, and NL were all significant predictors of survival (P < 0.015). posNn and Nr proved to be an accurate proxy of NL involvement. The best cutoff of posNn was 2 and of and Nr was 10%.
CONCLUSIONS: The level of nodal metastatic spread is a statistically significant prognostic factor in cancer of the pancreatic head. Both posNn and Nr are accurate proxy of NL and may improve patients' risk stratification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19777195     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0672-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  28 in total

1.  Prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Murakami; Kenichiro Uemura; Takeshi Sudo; Yasushi Hashimoto; Yoshio Yuasa; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Extended pancreatic resections and lymphadenectomy: An appraisal of the current evidence.

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande; Savio G Barreto
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-02-27

3.  Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio after resection of periampullary carcinomas.

Authors:  Shahid G Farid; Gavin A Falk; Daniel Joyce; Sricharan Chalikonda; R Matthew Walsh; Andrew M Smith; Gareth Morris-Stiff
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 4.  Ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas Seufferlein; Marc Porzner; Volker Heinemann; Andrea Tannapfel; Martin Stuschke; Waldemar Uhl
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node number, ratio and station in gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaolong Tang; Yingtai Chen; Lanwei Guo; Jianwei Zhang; Chengfeng Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Recent advances and limitations of surgical treatment for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-10

7.  Lymph node ratio as parameter of regional lymph node involvement in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Suguru Yamada; Tsutomu Fujii; Akihiro Hirakawa; Mitsuro Kanda; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  N0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The effect of lymph node number on accurate survival prediction in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nakul P Valsangkar; Devon M Bush; James S Michaelson; Cristina R Ferrone; Jennifer A Wargo; Keith D Lillemoe; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; Andrew L Warshaw; Sarah P Thayer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Accurate prediction of nodal status in preoperative patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using next-gen nanoparticle.

Authors:  Shaunagh McDermott; Sarah P Thayer; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Ralph Weissleder; Mukesh G Harisinghani
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 10.  Prognostic value of lymph node metastases detected during surgical exploration for pancreatic or periampullary cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lennart B van Rijssen; Poorvi Narwade; Nadine C M van Huijgevoort; Dorine S J Tseng; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Isaac Q Molenaar; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Casper H J van Eijck; Olivier R C Busch; Marc G H Besselink
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.