Literature DB >> 19776187

Diets enriched in oat bran or wheat bran temporally and differentially alter the composition of the fecal community of rats.

Khalil Abnous1, Stephen P J Brooks, Judy Kwan, Fernando Matias, Julia Green-Johnson, L Brent Selinger, Matthew Thomas, Martin Kalmokoff.   

Abstract

A clear understanding of how diet alters gastrointestinal communities is important given the suggested link between gut community composition and a wide variety of disease pathologies. To characterize this link for commonly consumed dietary fiber sources, we investigated the change in the fecal community of rats fed diets containing 5% nonnutritive fiber (control), 3% (wt:wt) oat bran plus 2% nonnutritive fiber (OB), or 5% (w/w) wheat bran (WB) over a 28-d feeding trial using both molecular- and cultivation-based methodologies. Pooled fecal samples from 8 rats fed the same diet were analyzed at 4 time points. On d 28, bran-fed rats had approximately twice the total cultivable bacteria than rats fed the control diet. Over the course of feeding, the cultivable community was initially dominated by bacteroides, then by bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, enterococci, and various enterics. In contrast, molecular analysis revealed the appearance of new operational taxonomic units (phylotypes) that were both temporally and inequitably distributed throughout the fecal community. The majority of change occurred in 2 major lineages within the Firmicutes: the Clostridium coccoides group and the Clostridium leptum subgroup. The time course of change depended on the source of bran, with the majority of new phylotypes appearing by d 14 (OB) or d 28 (WB), although adaptation of the fecal community was slow and continued over the entire feeding trial. Bacterial community richness was higher in bran-fed rats than in those fed the control diet. Change within the C. coccoides and C. leptum lineages likely reflect their high abundance within the gut bacterial community and the role of clostridia in fiber digestion. The results illustrate the limitations of relying solely on cultivation to assess bacterial changes and illustrate that community changes are complex in an ecosystem containing high numbers of interdependent and competing species of bacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19776187     DOI: 10.3945/jn.109.109470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  18 in total

1.  Structured variable selection with q-values.

Authors:  Tanya P Garcia; Samuel Müller; Raymond J Carroll; Tamara N Dunn; Anthony P Thomas; Sean H Adams; Suresh D Pillai; Rosemary L Walzem
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Characterization of Phascolarctobacterium succinatutens sp. nov., an asaccharolytic, succinate-utilizing bacterium isolated from human feces.

Authors:  Yohei Watanabe; Fumiko Nagai; Masami Morotomi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Variational Bayesian inference for association over phylogenetic trees for microorganisms.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Hao; Kent M Eskridge; Dong Wang
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 1.416

Review 4.  Obesity-associated cancer risk: the role of intestinal microbiota in the etiology of the host proinflammatory state.

Authors:  Zora Djuric
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 7.012

5.  Postbiotic and Anti-aflatoxigenic Capabilities of Lactobacillus kunkeei as the Potential Probiotic LAB Isolated from the Natural Honey.

Authors:  Maryam Ebrahimi; Alireza Sadeghi; Delasa Rahimi; Hosein Purabdolah; Sara Shahryari
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 4.609

6.  Phylogenetic and gene-centric metagenomics of the canine intestinal microbiome reveals similarities with humans and mice.

Authors:  Kelly S Swanson; Scot E Dowd; Jan S Suchodolski; Ingmar S Middelbos; Brittany M Vester; Kathleen A Barry; Karen E Nelson; Manolito Torralba; Bernard Henrissat; Pedro M Coutinho; Isaac K O Cann; Bryan A White; George C Fahey
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 10.302

7.  Metagenomic analysis of the Rhinopithecus bieti fecal microbiome reveals a broad diversity of bacterial and glycoside hydrolase profiles related to lignocellulose degradation.

Authors:  Bo Xu; Weijiang Xu; Junjun Li; Liming Dai; Caiyun Xiong; Xianghua Tang; Yunjuan Yang; Yuelin Mu; Junpei Zhou; Junmei Ding; Qian Wu; Zunxi Huang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Antimicrobial activity of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria isolated from cheeses and yogurts.

Authors:  En Yang; Lihua Fan; Yueming Jiang; Craig Doucette; Sherry Fillmore
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.298

9.  Effect of antimicrobial growth promoter administration on the intestinal microbiota of beef cattle.

Authors:  Kristen L Reti; Matthew C Thomas; L Jay Yanke; L Brent Selinger; G Douglas Inglis
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 4.181

10.  Metagenomic analysis of the pygmy loris fecal microbiome reveals unique functional capacity related to metabolism of aromatic compounds.

Authors:  Bo Xu; Weijiang Xu; Fuya Yang; Junjun Li; Yunjuan Yang; Xianghua Tang; Yuelin Mu; Junpei Zhou; Zunxi Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.