Literature DB >> 19776072

Flexible task allocation and the organization of work in ants.

Elva J H Robinson1, Ofer Feinerman, Nigel R Franks.   

Abstract

Flexibility in task performance is essential for a robust system of division of labour. We investigated what factors determine which social insect workers respond to colony-level changes in task demand. We used radio-frequency identification technology to compare the roles of corpulence, age, spatial location and previous activity (intra-nest/extra-nest) in determining whether worker ants (Temnothorax albipennis) respond to an increase in demand for foraging or brood care. The less corpulent ants took on the extra foraging, irrespective of their age, previous activity or location in the nest, supporting a physiological threshold model. We found no relationship between ants that tended the extra brood and corpulence, age, spatial location or previous activity, but ants that transported the extra brood to the main brood pile were less corpulent and had high previous intra-nest activity. This supports spatial task-encounter and physiological threshold models for brood transport. Our data suggest a flexible task-allocation system allowing the colony to respond rapidly to changing needs, using a simple task-encounter system for generalized tasks, combined with physiologically based response thresholds for more specialized tasks. This could provide a social insect colony with a robust division of labour, flexibly allocating the workforce in response to current needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19776072      PMCID: PMC2817103          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  9 in total

1.  Emergent polyethism as a consequence of increased colony size in insect societies.

Authors:  Jacques Gautrais; Guy Theraulaz; Jean-Louis Deneubourg; Carl Anderson
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2002-04-07       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 2.  Regulation of division of labor in insect societies.

Authors:  G E Robinson
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Individual experience alone can generate lasting division of labor in ants.

Authors:  Fabien Ravary; Emmanuel Lecoutey; Gwenaël Kaminski; Nicolas Châline; Pierre Jaisson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Do ants make direct comparisons?

Authors:  Elva J H Robinson; Faith D Smith; Kathryn M E Sullivan; Nigel R Franks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Doing the right thing: Ants, honeybees and naked mole-rats.

Authors:  C Tofts; N R Franks
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Division of labour and seasonality in the ant Leptothorax albipennis: worker corpulence and its influence on behaviour.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Organization of work in the honeybee: a compromise between division of labour and behavioural flexibility.

Authors:  Brian R Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Record dynamics in ants.

Authors:  Thomas O Richardson; Elva J H Robinson; Kim Christensen; Henrik J Jensen; Nigel R Franks; Ana B Sendova-Franks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Specialization does not predict individual efficiency in an ant.

Authors:  Anna Dornhaus
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 8.029

  9 in total
  27 in total

1.  Evolution of self-organized division of labor in a response threshold model.

Authors:  Ana Duarte; Ido Pen; Laurent Keller; Franz J Weissing
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Worker senescence and the sociobiology of aging in ants.

Authors:  Ysabel Milton Giraldo; James F A Traniello
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Percent lipid is associated with body size but not task in the bumble bee Bombus impatiens.

Authors:  Margaret J Couvillon; Jennifer M Jandt; Jennifer Bonds; Bryan R Helm; Anna Dornhaus
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Public goods dilemma in asexual ant societies.

Authors:  Shigeto Dobata; Kazuki Tsuji
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Harvester ants use interactions to regulate forager activation and availability.

Authors:  Noa Pinter-Wollman; Ashwin Bala; Andrew Merrell; Jovel Queirolo; Martin C Stumpe; Susan Holmes; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 6.  Individual versus collective cognition in social insects.

Authors:  Ofer Feinerman; Amos Korman
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  A simple threshold rule is sufficient to explain sophisticated collective decision-making.

Authors:  Elva J H Robinson; Nigel R Franks; Samuel Ellis; Saki Okuda; James A R Marshall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Tight knit under stress: colony resilience to the loss of tandem leaders during relocation in an Indian ant.

Authors:  Swetashree Kolay; Sumana Annagiri
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Worker personality and its association with spatially structured division of labor.

Authors:  Tobias Pamminger; Susanne Foitzik; Katharina C Kaufmann; Natalie Schützler; Florian Menzel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Ant genomics sheds light on the molecular regulation of social organization.

Authors:  Romain Libbrecht; Peter R Oxley; Daniel J C Kronauer; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.