Literature DB >> 19775304

A simple tool to measure patient perceptions of operative birth.

D Siassakos1, J Clark, T Sibanda, G Attilakos, A Jefferys, L Cullen, D Bisson, T Draycott.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and validity of a maternal satisfaction measurement tool, the SaFE study Patient Perception Score (PPS), after operative delivery.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: A large maternity unit in England. SAMPLE: 150 women who had had an operative birth.
METHODS: We recruited women within 24 hours of birth and quantified their satisfaction with two questionnaires: PPS, and the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale (CSRS; modified). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participation rate to determine feasibility; Cronbach's alpha as measure of internal consistency; PPS satisfaction scores for groups of accoucheurs of different seniority to assess construct validity; correlation coefficient of PPS scores with total scores from the CSRS questionnaire to establish criterion validity.
RESULTS: Participation rate approached 85%. We observed high scores for most births except a few outliers. Internal consistency of the PPS was high (Cronbach's alpha=0.83). Total PPS scores correlated strongly with total CSRS scores (Spearman's r=0.64, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The PPS is a simple and valid tool for patient-centred assessments. High scores were observed for most births but there were a small minority of accoucheurs who consistently scored poorly and these data could be used during appraisal and training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19775304     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02363.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  10 in total

1.  Outcomes of the novel Odon Device in indicated operative vaginal birth.

Authors:  Emily J Hotton; Erik Lenguerrand; Mary Alvarez; Stephen O'Brien; Tim J Draycott; Joanna F Crofts
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review.

Authors:  Alexandra Sawyer; Susan Ayers; Jane Abbott; Gillian Gyte; Heike Rabe; Lelia Duley
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Kate F Walker; Philippa Wilson; George J Bugg; Anna Dencker; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Evaluation of Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale in Iran: What Are the Psychometric Properties?

Authors:  Zahra Moudi; Mahmoud Tavousi
Journal:  Nurs Midwifery Stud       Date:  2016-05-21

5.  Validation of the Spanish version of Mackey childbirth satisfaction rating scale.

Authors:  Pablo Caballero; Beatriz E Delgado-García; Isabel Orts-Cortes; Joaquin Moncho; Pamela Pereyra-Zamora; Andreu Nolasco
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Satisfaction with childbirth services provided in public health facilities: results from a cross- sectional survey among postnatal women in Chhattisgarh, India.

Authors:  Paridhi Jha; Margareta Larsson; Kyllike Christensson; Agneta Skoog Svanberg
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 7.  Measuring women's childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments.

Authors:  Helena Nilvér; Cecily Begley; Marie Berg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Evaluation of the psychometric properties of Hindi-translated Scale for Measuring Maternal Satisfaction among postnatal women in Chhattisgarh, India.

Authors:  Paridhi Jha; Margareta Larsson; Kyllike Christensson; Agneta Skoog Svanberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Essential newborn care practice at four primary health facilities in conflict affected areas of Bossaso, Somalia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ribka Amsalu; Catherine N Morris; Kingsley Chukwumalu; Michelle Hynes; Shehryar Janjua; Alexia Couture; Aimee Summers; Amy Cannon; Erin N Hulland; Sabine Baunach
Journal:  Confl Health       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.723

10.  Physical and Psychological Childbirth Experiences and Early Infant Temperament.

Authors:  Carmen Power; Claire Williams; Amy Brown
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.