BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: gamma-Secretase inhibitors (GSIs) block NOTCH receptor cleavage and pathway activation and have been under clinical evaluation for the treatment of malignancies such as T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (T-ALL). The ability of GSIs to decrease T-ALL cell viability in vitro is a slow process requiring >8 days, however, such treatment durations are not well tolerated in vivo. Here we study GSI's effect on tumour and normal cellular processes to optimize dosing regimens for anti-tumour efficacy. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Inhibition of the Notch pathway in mouse intestinal epithelium was used to evaluate the effect of GSIs and guide the design of dosing regimens for xenograft models. Serum Abeta(40) and Notch target gene modulation in tumours were used to evaluate the degree and duration of target inhibition. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic correlations with biochemical, immunohistochemical and profiling data were used to demonstrate GSI mechanism of action in xenograft tumours. KEY RESULTS: Three days of >70% Notch pathway inhibition was sufficient to provide an anti-tumour effect and was well tolerated. GSI-induced conversion of mouse epithelial cells to a secretory lineage was time- and dose-dependent. Anti-tumour efficacy was associated with cell cycle arrest and apoptosis that was in part due to Notch-dependent regulation of mitochondrial homeostasis. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Intermittent but potent inhibition of Notch signalling is sufficient for anti-tumour efficacy in these T-ALL models. These findings provide support for the use of GSI in Notch-dependent malignancies and that clinical benefits may be derived from transient but potent inhibition of Notch.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: gamma-Secretase inhibitors (GSIs) block NOTCH receptor cleavage and pathway activation and have been under clinical evaluation for the treatment of malignancies such as T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (T-ALL). The ability of GSIs to decrease T-ALL cell viability in vitro is a slow process requiring >8 days, however, such treatment durations are not well tolerated in vivo. Here we study GSI's effect on tumour and normal cellular processes to optimize dosing regimens for anti-tumour efficacy. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Inhibition of the Notch pathway in mouse intestinal epithelium was used to evaluate the effect of GSIs and guide the design of dosing regimens for xenograft models. Serum Abeta(40) and Notch target gene modulation in tumours were used to evaluate the degree and duration of target inhibition. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic correlations with biochemical, immunohistochemical and profiling data were used to demonstrate GSI mechanism of action in xenograft tumours. KEY RESULTS: Three days of >70% Notch pathway inhibition was sufficient to provide an anti-tumour effect and was well tolerated. GSI-induced conversion of mouse epithelial cells to a secretory lineage was time- and dose-dependent. Anti-tumour efficacy was associated with cell cycle arrest and apoptosis that was in part due to Notch-dependent regulation of mitochondrial homeostasis. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Intermittent but potent inhibition of Notch signalling is sufficient for anti-tumour efficacy in these T-ALL models. These findings provide support for the use of GSI in Notch-dependent malignancies and that clinical benefits may be derived from transient but potent inhibition of Notch.
Authors: Andrew P Weng; Adolfo A Ferrando; Woojoong Lee; John P Morris; Lewis B Silverman; Cheryll Sanchez-Irizarry; Stephen C Blacklow; A Thomas Look; Jon C Aster Journal: Science Date: 2004-10-08 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: S T Smiley; M Reers; C Mottola-Hartshorn; M Lin; A Chen; T W Smith; G D Steele; L B Chen Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1991-05-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: P de la Peña; B Bornstein; P del Hoyo; M A Fernández-Moreno; M A Martín; Y Campos; C Gómez-Escalonilla; J A Molina; A Cabello; J Arenas; R Garesse Journal: Neurology Date: 2001-10-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Joseph Milano; Jenny McKay; Claude Dagenais; Linda Foster-Brown; Francois Pognan; Reto Gadient; Robert T Jacobs; Anna Zacco; Barry Greenberg; Paul J Ciaccio Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2004-08-19 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Kathleen Cullion; Kyle M Draheim; Nicole Hermance; Jennifer Tammam; Vishva M Sharma; Christopher Ware; George Nikov; Veena Krishnamoorthy; Pradip K Majumder; Michelle A Kelliher Journal: Blood Date: 2009-02-26 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Andrew P Weng; Yunsun Nam; Michael S Wolfe; Warren S Pear; James D Griffin; Stephen C Blacklow; Jon C Aster Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: Weisheng Zhang; Brian B Haines; Clay Efferson; Joe Zhu; Chris Ware; Kaiko Kunii; Jennifer Tammam; Minilik Angagaw; Marlene C Hinton; Heike Keilhack; Cloud P Paweletz; Theresa Zhang; Chris Winter; Sriram Sathyanarayanan; Jonathan Cheng; Leigh Zawel; Stephen Fawell; Gary Gilliland; Pradip K Majumder Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2012-12-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Hind Medyouf; Xiuhua Gao; Florence Armstrong; Samuel Gusscott; Qing Liu; Amanda Larson Gedman; Larry H Matherly; Kirk R Schultz; Francoise Pflumio; Mingjian James You; Andrew P Weng Journal: Blood Date: 2009-12-11 Impact factor: 22.113